COMPARISON OF CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES USED IN AFFORESTATION PROJECTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASAADI A.M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

753

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES USED IN AFFORESTATION PROJECTS

Author(s)

ASAADI A.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSSQ3

PINUS NIGRAQ3

CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENSQ3

ROBINIA PSEUDACACIAQ2

PLATANUS ORIENTALISQ2

Abstract

This research was carried out in a reforest at Shirvan Agriculture College in two years (2005-2007). The aim of this research was to determine of CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS, throughfall and stemflow. Four trees species were used including PINUS NIGRA, CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS, ROBINIA PSEUDACACIA and PLATANUS ORIENTALIS with three replications. The results showed that the amount of CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS, throughfall and stemflow of PINUS NIGRA and CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS was 34.77, 63.73, 1.43 and 44.97, 53.08, 1.63 percent, respectively. These amounts for ROBINIA PSEUDACACIA and PLATANUS ORIENTALIS species were 9.78, 89.42, 0.8 and 5.5, 93.97, 0.53 percent, respectively. There was a significant difference in CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS between PINUS NIGRA and CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference (P<0.05) in interception loss between ROBINIA PSEUDACACIA and PLATANUS ORIENTALIS species. Furthermore, a significant difference (P<0.01) was observed in interception loss between evergreen and deciduous trees. The results showed that CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS had the highest interception loss than other trees species.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ASAADI, A.M.. (2009). COMPARISON OF CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES USED IN AFFORESTATION PROJECTS. JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16(4), 85-96. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/156765/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASAADI A.M.. COMPARISON OF CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES USED IN AFFORESTATION PROJECTS. JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2009;16(4):85-96. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/156765/en

IEEE: Copy

A.M. ASAADI, “COMPARISON OF CANOPY INTERCEPTION LOSS IN EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES USED IN AFFORESTATION PROJECTS,” JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 85–96, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/156765/en

Related Journal Papers