مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,013
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES (DOUBLE-BOUNDED AND ONE- HALF BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE METHODS) IN VALUATION OF RECREATIONAL RESOURCES: CASE STUDY OF JIROFT KONAR SANDAL HILL

Pages

  175-192

Abstract

 In this paper, the RECREATIONAL VALUE of the Jiroft Konar Sandal hill in Kerman was estimated. In addition to visitors' willingness-to-pay (WTP), by using CONTINGENT VALUATION METHODS, Double- Bounded and One- Half Bounded Dichotomous Choice methods were used and compared. To achieve this goal, required data were collected through filling up questionnaire and interview with a sample of 115 visitors in 2013. The results showed that the OOHB approach was better than DB approach because it had more denote significant explanatory variables and the absolute value of the logarithmic likelihood and maximum likelihood. The average willingness to pay using One- Half Bounded dichotomous choice method was 4500 Rials per visit. The result of using One-Half Bounded dichotomous choice method was a little different from willingness to pay.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    AMIRNEJAD, H., & AMIRTAIMOORI, S.. (2017). COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES (DOUBLE-BOUNDED AND ONE- HALF BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE METHODS) IN VALUATION OF RECREATIONAL RESOURCES: CASE STUDY OF JIROFT KONAR SANDAL HILL. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 9(2 (34)), 175-192. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/158693/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AMIRNEJAD H., AMIRTAIMOORI S.. COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES (DOUBLE-BOUNDED AND ONE- HALF BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE METHODS) IN VALUATION OF RECREATIONAL RESOURCES: CASE STUDY OF JIROFT KONAR SANDAL HILL. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;9(2 (34)):175-192. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/158693/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. AMIRNEJAD, and S. AMIRTAIMOORI, “COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES (DOUBLE-BOUNDED AND ONE- HALF BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE METHODS) IN VALUATION OF RECREATIONAL RESOURCES: CASE STUDY OF JIROFT KONAR SANDAL HILL,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, vol. 9, no. 2 (34), pp. 175–192, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/158693/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button