مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,132
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN TREES TRUNK VOLUME ESTIMATION

Pages

  177-191

Abstract

 Nowadays, REGRESSION analysis is a common method to estimate trees stem volume. Althought TREES TRUNK VOLUME can be estimated with a certain accuracy, however there are many constraints such as normality of variables and homogeneity of errors variance, when foresters use this method. In this study, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) as a subset of the technology of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI), was used as a new method to estimate the volume trunk. For this purpose, 101 trees were selected. Marked trees were located in Research and Educational Forest of Tarbiat Modarres University (REFTMU). DBH, diameter at stump height, end diameter trunk, trunk height and total tree height were mesuared with high accuracy during tree marking. Two neural network models, MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON (MLP) and RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION (RBF), were developed to estimate trunk volume. The results showed that with increasing the number of variables, that have more correlation with trunk volume, correlation coefficient of neural networks increased from 0.80 to .95. Also the RBF neural network was more accuracte in trunk volume estimation than to MLP neural network. Comparing evaluation criteria for ANN with stepwise REGRESSION showed that MLP and RBF neural networks had RMSE value 1.18 and 1.05, respectively while the RMSE value of REGRESSION was 2.57. Also the REGRESSION correlation coefficient is less in compared with two models neural network.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BAYATI, HADI, & NAJAFI, AKBAR. (2013). PERFORMANCE COMPARISON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN TREES TRUNK VOLUME ESTIMATION. JOURNAL OF FOREST AND WOOD PRODUCTS (JFWP) (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES), 66(2), 177-191. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/163025/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BAYATI HADI, NAJAFI AKBAR. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN TREES TRUNK VOLUME ESTIMATION. JOURNAL OF FOREST AND WOOD PRODUCTS (JFWP) (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2013;66(2):177-191. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/163025/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HADI BAYATI, and AKBAR NAJAFI, “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WITH REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN TREES TRUNK VOLUME ESTIMATION,” JOURNAL OF FOREST AND WOOD PRODUCTS (JFWP) (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 177–191, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/163025/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top