مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

572
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NASH VS HYBRID MODELS, PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS TO MODEL RAINFALL-RUNOFF PROCESS (CASE STUDY: ALANDCHAY WATERSHED)

Pages

  25-33

Abstract

 Rainfall-runoff hydrological models have been recognized as indispensable essential tools for water resources management throughout the world. In this respect, Nash and HYBRID MODELs have been developed as rainfall-runoff models in recent years. Within the present research, the different methods were evaluated to estimate the mentioned models, parameters in ALANDCHAY WATERSHED in West Azarbayjan and with the models being compared with each other. To follow the purpose, HYBRID MODEL parameter within the base of empirical method and NASH MODEL parameters (using eight different methods) were estimated. To evaluate the capability of the two mentioned models, such statistical indices as RMSE, R2 and MAE were employed. The least error bearing indices and the high values of determination coefficient indicated the potential of the two models for modeling the flood hydrographs. A comparison of the statistical indices, values and calculated errors showed that NASH MODEL benefited from a better performance than the HYBRID MODEL. The mean error of peak discharge for Nash and HYBRID MODELs were obtained 5.99 and 12.07 m3/s and while the mean error of flood hydrograph peak time for the mentioned models were recorded as 0 and 3 hours, respectively.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BEHMANESH, JAVAD, KHANMOHAMMADI, NEDA, & AMIATAEE, BABAK. (2016). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NASH VS HYBRID MODELS, PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS TO MODEL RAINFALL-RUNOFF PROCESS (CASE STUDY: ALANDCHAY WATERSHED). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 47(1), 25-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/225652/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BEHMANESH JAVAD, KHANMOHAMMADI NEDA, AMIATAEE BABAK. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NASH VS HYBRID MODELS, PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS TO MODEL RAINFALL-RUNOFF PROCESS (CASE STUDY: ALANDCHAY WATERSHED). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH[Internet]. 2016;47(1):25-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/225652/en

    IEEE: Copy

    JAVAD BEHMANESH, NEDA KHANMOHAMMADI, and BABAK AMIATAEE, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF NASH VS HYBRID MODELS, PARAMETER ESTIMATION METHODS TO MODEL RAINFALL-RUNOFF PROCESS (CASE STUDY: ALANDCHAY WATERSHED),” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/225652/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button