مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

540
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF MPSIAC AND EPM EMPIRICAL MODELS IN WESTERN AZERBAIJAN PROVINCE BASED ON SEDIMENT SURVEYING BEHIND SMALL DAMS

Pages

  265-273

Abstract

 Soil SEDIMENT/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> EROSION AND SEDIMENT transport is an important issue in many Iranian WATERSHEDs. WATERSHED planning without accurate estimates of SEDIMENT/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> EROSION AND SEDIMENT yield with appropriate models is not possible. The objective of this study was evaluating of two common empirical models of MPSIAC and EPM. First, 10 small WATERSHEDs were selected in Western Azerbaijan Province, with several consecutive check DAMs on their streams implemented under WATERSHED management projects. No flow over the last downstream check DAM was considered as the main criterion in each selected basin. In addition to the direct measurement of SEDIMENT deposited behind the DAMs, SEDIMENT yield of WATERSHEDs were estimated using the models. Comparison of means using (Mann-Whithney) did not show any significant difference at 0. 05 percent level between measured and estimated data. At final step, both models were tested by MAE and MBE statistics. The MPSIAC showed better performance than EPM with MAE=1. 34 and MBE =-0. 12.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BOROOSHKE, EBRAHIM, & ARABKHEDRI, MAHMOOD. (2015). EVALUATION OF MPSIAC AND EPM EMPIRICAL MODELS IN WESTERN AZERBAIJAN PROVINCE BASED ON SEDIMENT SURVEYING BEHIND SMALL DAMS. WATERSHED ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 7(3 ), 265-273. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/234654/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BOROOSHKE EBRAHIM, ARABKHEDRI MAHMOOD. EVALUATION OF MPSIAC AND EPM EMPIRICAL MODELS IN WESTERN AZERBAIJAN PROVINCE BASED ON SEDIMENT SURVEYING BEHIND SMALL DAMS. WATERSHED ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2015;7(3 ):265-273. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/234654/en

    IEEE: Copy

    EBRAHIM BOROOSHKE, and MAHMOOD ARABKHEDRI, “EVALUATION OF MPSIAC AND EPM EMPIRICAL MODELS IN WESTERN AZERBAIJAN PROVINCE BASED ON SEDIMENT SURVEYING BEHIND SMALL DAMS,” WATERSHED ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 7, no. 3 , pp. 265–273, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/234654/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button