FLOOD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND EVALUATION AND MIXED CRITERIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BANIHABIB MOHAMMAD EBRAHIM; LAGHABDOOST ARANI ABOLFAZL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering Year:2014 | Volume:4 | Issue:14 Page(s): 72-82

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

939

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FLOOD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND EVALUATION AND MIXED CRITERIA

Author(s)

BANIHABIB MOHAMMAD EBRAHIM | LAGHABDOOST ARANI ABOLFAZL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AHPQ1

EVAMIXQ2

FLOOD MANAGEMENTQ2

GORGANROOD CATCHMENTQ1

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKINGQ2

Abstract

Flood has destructive effects on the social, economic and environmentaround world and FLOOD MANAGEMENT is able to decrease destructive effect of a flood. Because of the multi-dimensional impacts of floods, application of multi criteria decision making as a decision tool will be useful in FLOOD MANAGEMENT. In this article, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and evaluation and mixed criteria (EVAMIX) models are used for the ranking of seven FLOOD MANAGEMENT measures in Gorganrood River FLOOD MANAGEMENT project, including non-project condition, Golestan reservoir management, levee construction, construction of diversion channel, flood forecasting and warning system, flood insurance, and flood warning system and flood insurance integration. Eleven criteria including expected average number of casualties, recovery rate, gradual rate, expected annual damage, safety feeling, employment rate, public participation, landscape protection, wildlife habitat conservation, water quality conservation and technical feasibility and performance were used for evaluation of the measures. Ranking results shows that these two models were contradict just in first and second rank, So that, the AHP allocated Golestan reservoir measure in first place and EVAMIX preferred flood warning system and flood insurance integration measure. But the other ranks were the same in both of the models. Thus, the models didn't rank measures so differently, but nomination of the best measure was different to each other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BANIHABIB, MOHAMMAD EBRAHIM, & LAGHABDOOST ARANI, ABOLFAZL. (2014). FLOOD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND EVALUATION AND MIXED CRITERIA. IRANIAN OF IRRIGATION & WATER ENGINEERING, 4(14), 72-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/247291/en

Vancouver: Copy

BANIHABIB MOHAMMAD EBRAHIM, LAGHABDOOST ARANI ABOLFAZL. FLOOD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND EVALUATION AND MIXED CRITERIA. IRANIAN OF IRRIGATION & WATER ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2014;4(14):72-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/247291/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD EBRAHIM BANIHABIB, and ABOLFAZL LAGHABDOOST ARANI, “FLOOD MANAGEMENT OPTIONS USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AND EVALUATION AND MIXED CRITERIA,” IRANIAN OF IRRIGATION & WATER ENGINEERING, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 72–82, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/247291/en

Related Journal Papers