Comparing the Response Characteristics and Volumetric Water Balance in Three Unit Hydrograph Methods (A case study: Vanak Basin)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Bayati Samira; Nasr Esfahani Mohammad Ali; Abdollahi Khodayar

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY Year:2018 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 Page(s): 373-385

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

749

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparing the Response Characteristics and Volumetric Water Balance in Three Unit Hydrograph Methods (A case study: Vanak Basin)

Author(s)

Bayati Samira | Nasr Esfahani Mohammad Ali | Abdollahi Khodayar | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEC-HMS modelQ2

Nash-SutclifQ1

Unit HydrographQ2

Vanak BasinQ3

Abstract

Unit Hydrograph is a method for flood hydrograph simulation resulting n response to a unit of excess rainfall on the basin. The theory for Unit Hydrograph is based on two systematic principles called superposition and proportionality. So far several methods of Unit Hydrograph has been developed which show different responses and functionalities under local conditions of the basin. In this study we used a continuous hydrologic simulation from HEC-HMS model to compare the performance of three unit SMA algorithm and linear reservoir were selected as loss and base-flow functions of the basin, respectively. The flood hydrograph and its specifications including peak discharge and runoff volume were derived using three ways of Snyder, Clark and SCS methods. To compare the performance of models the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency was considered as as the objective function. Parameterization and validation of the hydrological parameters were done by changing parameters manually and a applying a trial-error method. Results showed for all three methods the percent of differences between the simulated and observed volumes for runoff was quite very close to each other. While in term of peak flows, the Clarke Unit Hydrograph method showed the best agreement between the simulated and observed peak discharges.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Bayati, Samira, Nasr Esfahani, Mohammad Ali, & Abdollahi, Khodayar. (2018). Comparing the Response Characteristics and Volumetric Water Balance in Three Unit Hydrograph Methods (A case study: Vanak Basin). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, 5(2 ), 373-385. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/254051/en

Vancouver: Copy

Bayati Samira, Nasr Esfahani Mohammad Ali, Abdollahi Khodayar. Comparing the Response Characteristics and Volumetric Water Balance in Three Unit Hydrograph Methods (A case study: Vanak Basin). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY[Internet]. 2018;5(2 ):373-385. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/254051/en

IEEE: Copy

Samira Bayati, Mohammad Ali Nasr Esfahani, and Khodayar Abdollahi, “Comparing the Response Characteristics and Volumetric Water Balance in Three Unit Hydrograph Methods (A case study: Vanak Basin),” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, vol. 5, no. 2 , pp. 373–385, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/254051/en

Related Journal Papers