Prioritization of flood risk based on multi-criteria decision-making models (Gray systems theory-ELECTRE-TOPSIS)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAMMADI PARVIN; MALEKIAN ARASH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY Year:2017 | Volume:4 | Issue:2 Page(s): 499-508

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

685

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Prioritization of flood risk based on multi-criteria decision-making models (Gray systems theory-ELECTRE-TOPSIS)

Author(s)

MOHAMMADI PARVIN | MALEKIAN ARASH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making modelQ2

ElectreQ2

GreyQ2

TOPSISQ2

Shannon entropyQ2

Abstract

In recent years, flood control projects have been more extended in the country. Given the cost of implementation, prioritizing the sub-basins is of great importance and making decisions about flood and integrated watershed management is quite necessary. The first and most important step in the runoff flood management projects is prioritizing essential areas to carry out flood control projects. Decision-making methods provide effective tools for dealing with issues involving more than one goal. In this study, Parchin watershed basin was studied. Then, using multi-criteria decision-making methods (Electre, Grey and TOPSIS), the sub-basins were prioritized. The results of Grey method were investigated by gray relational analysis for the score of 9 sub-basins. The sub-basin 7 with the highest score (0. 719443) was prioritized as the first, and sub-basin 1 with score of (0. 466119) was determined to be the second priority and, sub-basin 4 with the lowest score value (. 331493) was introduced as the last priority. In TOPSIS method, rating was done using calculated nearness to ideal solution options, sub-basin 7 with the highest nearness coefficient (0. 843721) is ranked first. The results from rating showed that all three methods were evaluated equally in first priority; however, other priority methods gave different results. According to the above-mentioned results, the three TOPSIS methods and gray analysis are more similar and more accurate than the electronic method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAMMADI, PARVIN, & MALEKIAN, ARASH. (2017). Prioritization of flood risk based on multi-criteria decision-making models (Gray systems theory-ELECTRE-TOPSIS). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, 4(2 ), 499-508. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/254080/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAMMADI PARVIN, MALEKIAN ARASH. Prioritization of flood risk based on multi-criteria decision-making models (Gray systems theory-ELECTRE-TOPSIS). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY[Internet]. 2017;4(2 ):499-508. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/254080/en

IEEE: Copy

PARVIN MOHAMMADI, and ARASH MALEKIAN, “Prioritization of flood risk based on multi-criteria decision-making models (Gray systems theory-ELECTRE-TOPSIS),” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, vol. 4, no. 2 , pp. 499–508, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/254080/en

Related Journal Papers