COMPARISON OF AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ESTIMATION METHODS FOR USE IN SIMULATION MODELS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHOKOUHI A.R.; DANESHKAR ARASTEH P.

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH Year:2008 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 95-112

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

762

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ESTIMATION METHODS FOR USE IN SIMULATION MODELS

Author(s)

SHOKOUHI A.R. | DANESHKAR ARASTEH P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DATA GENERATIONQ3

GEOSTATISTICAL METHODQ3

GISQ3

GROUNDWATER MODELINGQ3

PROBABILISTIC METHODSQ3

Abstract

The current study investigated and compared DATA GENERATION methods for GROUNDWATER MODELING. These methods can be divided into two classes; geostatistic and probabilistic. By comparing geostatistic methods, the best method was chosen and the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer was generated for a study area in a grid (9-cell) format. After observing weak spatial correlation between the data, the probabilistic method was then considered. The Monte Carlo technique was used for DATA GENERATION for the governing distribution function using the probabilistic method. Finally, the results of the two methods were compared. The ground water model used in this research was PMWIN 5.3 (MODFLOW). This model was used to predict the future state of an aquifer by using the generated data and time series of precipitation. Existing input data processing, DATA GENERATION by geostatistic/stochastic methods and representation of model output were performed using ARC/INFO GRID.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHOKOUHI, A.R., & DANESHKAR ARASTEH, P.. (2008). COMPARISON OF AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ESTIMATION METHODS FOR USE IN SIMULATION MODELS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 9(2), 95-112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28054/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHOKOUHI A.R., DANESHKAR ARASTEH P.. COMPARISON OF AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ESTIMATION METHODS FOR USE IN SIMULATION MODELS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2008;9(2):95-112. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28054/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. SHOKOUHI, and P. DANESHKAR ARASTEH, “COMPARISON OF AQUIFER HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ESTIMATION METHODS FOR USE IN SIMULATION MODELS,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 95–112, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28054/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

File Not Exists.

Move to top

وبگردی