مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,505
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THREE CONVENTIONAL RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS IN MAZANDARAN, IRAN

Pages

  73-86

Abstract

 Two types of paddy COMBINE HARVESTER (head-feed and whole-crop) are commonly available in different widths in developed countries. The use of COMBINE HARVESTERs can greatly decrease labor costs and efficiency. COMBINE HARVESTERs have been introduced in several East Asian countries (China, Japan, South Korea) to decrease costs, but their technical and economic performance has not yet been studied. The current study examined three COMBINE HARVESTERs with different mechanisms and widths: Iseki (2 rows, head-feed; Japan), Kukje (3 rows, head-feed, South Korea); Jiangsu (whole-crop, China). The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that there were significant differences between treatments for field efficiency, loss, feed rate, theoretical and effective field capacity, and cost per ha. There was no significant difference in slippage among the COMBINE HARVESTERs. The whole-crop combine had the highest rate of loss at 1.74% (excluding natural loss) and soil compaction. The whole-crop combined cost per ha was lowest at 1.3873 million rials. It can be concluded that the whole-crop combine performed the best of the tested combines.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAFARI, M., ALIZADEH, M.R., & GERAMI, K.. (2014). COMPARISON OF THREE CONVENTIONAL RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS IN MAZANDARAN, IRAN. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 14(4), 73-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28135/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAFARI M., ALIZADEH M.R., GERAMI K.. COMPARISON OF THREE CONVENTIONAL RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS IN MAZANDARAN, IRAN. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2014;14(4):73-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28135/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. SAFARI, M.R. ALIZADEH, and K. GERAMI, “COMPARISON OF THREE CONVENTIONAL RICE COMBINE HARVESTERS IN MAZANDARAN, IRAN,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 73–86, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28135/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button