مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

407
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Providing the Volume Balance Equation for the New Two-Point Method

Pages

  1055-1066

Abstract

 Advance data and infiltration parameters are used to evaluate surface irrigation. Philip infiltration equation is one of the most widely used equations in surface irrigation. For the first time, Shepard et al. (1993) presented a one-point method to determine the parameters of the Philip infiltration equation in surface irrigation. In recent years, a new two-point method has been proposed to determine the parameters of Philip infiltration equation. In the new method, the Volume balance equation is not presented. As a result, the Shepard et al. (1993) Volume balance equation is used to determine the advance phase (Ebrahimian-Sheppard method). In this study, the Volume balance equation for the new two-point method is presented. The Volume balance equation presented in this study was evaluated with five independent furrow irrigation data sets and different input conditions. Results showed that mean value of root mean square error in Shepard et al. (1993), Ebrahimian-Shepard (2010) method and new two points were 40. 5, 30. 3 and 10. 9, respectively. The absolute mean error of prediction had the lowest equilibrium of 9. 6% in the new two-point method followed by the Ebrahimian-Sheppard (2010) and Sheppard et al. (1993) methods with 19. 5 and 20. 4%, respectively. The coefficient of determination for all three methods was more than 0. 97. In general, it can be concluded that the method presented in this study predicts the Advance curve with higher accuracy compared to the other two methods.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Maghferati, H.R., CHARI, M.M., AFRASIAB, P., & DELBARI, M.. (2020). Providing the Volume Balance Equation for the New Two-Point Method. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 13(3 ), 1055-1066. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/379205/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Maghferati H.R., CHARI M.M., AFRASIAB P., DELBARI M.. Providing the Volume Balance Equation for the New Two-Point Method. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE[Internet]. 2020;13(3 ):1055-1066. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/379205/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H.R. Maghferati, M.M. CHARI, P. AFRASIAB, and M. DELBARI, “Providing the Volume Balance Equation for the New Two-Point Method,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, vol. 13, no. 3 , pp. 1055–1066, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/379205/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button