Evaluation of Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Based on Non-Dominating Sorting Approach for Multi Objective Optimization Operation of Reservoirs

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shabani Bohlooli A.; Dastoorani M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Water and Soil Conservation Year:2020 | Volume:26 | Issue:5 Page(s): 165-179

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

803

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation of Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Based on Non-Dominating Sorting Approach for Multi Objective Optimization Operation of Reservoirs

Author(s)

Shabani Bohlooli A. | Dastoorani M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Flood ControlQ1

Malla-Sadra DamQ1

Meta-Heurestic AlgorithmsQ1

Performance CriteriaQ1

Abstract

Background and Objectives: As a crucial issue in aqua sciences, optimizing dam reservoirs exploitation has been studied with a variety of optimization techniques. In recent years, a large number of multi-objective Meta-Heuristic algorithms have been introduced. One of these algorithms is the second version of the multi-objective genetic algorithm with nun-dominated sorting, which was introduced in 2002 by Deb and et. al. Materials and Methods: In this research, the innovation and aim are to use the particle swarm algorithm with nun-dominated sorting approach and evaluate the efficiency of this algorithm in the optimization of operation of the reservoir performance. Finally, the results are compared with the NSGA-II algorithm, which ultimately leads to a sustainable management policy for water resource systems, and in particular the exploitation of the reservoir. In this research, the multi-objective version of the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization were investigated using concepts such as Non-dominated sorting and crowding distance and used to solve the optimization problem of the Mulla-Sadra reservoir in Fars province. The problem of optimization defined with two goals. One of them was minimizing difference between agriculture demand end releases. The second of objective function was maximizing flood storage volume. The two algorithms compared with criteria such as the run time, the number of solutions placed on the Pareto front, standard deviation and Performance Criteria (dispersion criteria). Results: The results of the research indicated that both algorithms have the ability to solve this optimization problem. Also, the results indicated that the algorithms have somewhat more performance than some other criteria. The results of the investigation of the runtime of each of the algorithms showed that the performance of the multi-objective particle swarm algorithm (NSPSO-II) is far more than the NSGA-II algorithm, so that the average runtime of the NSGA-II algorithm in the population of 50 The value of 21. 3879 seconds is approximately three times the average runtime in the NSPSO-II algorithm with a value of 6. 3169 seconds. Regarding the performance criterion, the NSPSO-II algorithm has a better performance than the NSGA-II algorithm. On the other hand, according to the number of solutions on the Pareto front, the NSGA-II algorithm found a lot more solutions on the Pareto front, for this reason, the standard deviation in the NSGA-II algorithm was less than NSPSO-II. Conclusions: The NSGA-II algorithm found a lot more solutions on the Pareto optimal front, and the solutions on the Pareto optimal fronted properly covered the Pareto front, unlike the NSPSO algorithm. Also, comparing the solutions in the Pareto optimal front showed that the NSPSO-II algorithm was stepped up to maximize the second target function, while the NSGA-II algorithm moved in the direction of minimizing the objective function.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shabani Bohlooli, A., & Dastoorani, M.. (2020). Evaluation of Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Based on Non-Dominating Sorting Approach for Multi Objective Optimization Operation of Reservoirs. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), 26(5 ), 165-179. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/409268/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shabani Bohlooli A., Dastoorani M.. Evaluation of Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Based on Non-Dominating Sorting Approach for Multi Objective Optimization Operation of Reservoirs. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2020;26(5 ):165-179. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/409268/en

IEEE: Copy

A. Shabani Bohlooli, and M. Dastoorani, “Evaluation of Genetic and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Based on Non-Dominating Sorting Approach for Multi Objective Optimization Operation of Reservoirs,” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 26, no. 5 , pp. 165–179, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/409268/en

Related Journal Papers