COMPARISON OF A NEW FUNGICIDE (OPUS) WITH COMMON FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEW OF SUGAR BEET

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEYDARI A.; SAFAEI D.; URUMCHI S.; BASATI J.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Sugar Beet Year:2006 | Volume:21 | Issue:2 Page(s): 179-188

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,488

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF A NEW FUNGICIDE (OPUS) WITH COMMON FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEW OF SUGAR BEET

Author(s)

HEYDARI A. | SAFAEI D. | URUMCHI S. | BASATI J. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SUGAR BEETQ3

POWDERY MILDEWQ3

CHEMICAL CONTROLQ3

IRANQ4

Abstract

In this study, recently produced fungicide Opus was compared with current fungicides Dinocap, Sulfur and Calyxin for controlling POWDERY MILDEW disease of SUGAR BEET in completely randomized block field experiments conducted in Kermanshah and West Azarbaijan provinces. Fungicides were applied according to the recommended field dosages. There were five treatments (four fungicides plus a water-spray control) each with four replicates. Disease incidence was evaluated 15 days after the last application based on infection index on SUGAR BEET leaves collected from different treatments. Infection index varied from 1 (no infection) to 6 (81- 100% infection). Analysis of the results indicated that in Miandoab experiment for both years there were significant differences among different treatments in disease incidence and the fungicide Opus was the most effective in reducing infection. In the first year of Mahidasht experiment there were no significant differences among different treatments due to very low occurrence of the disease in the field. In contrast, in the second year significant differences were observed in different treatments. Despite higher root yield and sugar content in fungicide treatments, compared to the control, these differences were not significant.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HEYDARI, A., SAFAEI, D., URUMCHI, S., & BASATI, J.. (2006). COMPARISON OF A NEW FUNGICIDE (OPUS) WITH COMMON FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEW OF SUGAR BEET. JOURNAL OF SUGAR BEET, 21(2), 179-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/57595/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEYDARI A., SAFAEI D., URUMCHI S., BASATI J.. COMPARISON OF A NEW FUNGICIDE (OPUS) WITH COMMON FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEW OF SUGAR BEET. JOURNAL OF SUGAR BEET[Internet]. 2006;21(2):179-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/57595/en

IEEE: Copy

A. HEYDARI, D. SAFAEI, S. URUMCHI, and J. BASATI, “COMPARISON OF A NEW FUNGICIDE (OPUS) WITH COMMON FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEW OF SUGAR BEET,” JOURNAL OF SUGAR BEET, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/57595/en

Related Journal Papers