مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

713
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

265
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

3

Information Journal Paper

Title

FORAGE YIELD PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM SPP. ARVENSE L.) GENOTYPES AND ASSESSMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS

Pages

  1621-1634

Abstract

 This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of forage pea (Pisum sativum spp. arvense L.) genotypes, in terms of fresh forage yield and associated traits, when grown on the KIZILTEPE PLAIN, Mardin, Turkey. Field trials were performed during the 2007-08 and 2009-2010 growing seasons. The experiments were arranged according to randomized block design with three replications. The following trait ranges were reported: Days to 50% flowering: 147.5-162.5 days, Natural plant height and Main Stem Height: 45.58-72.75 cm, Main stem height: 52.52-100.42 cm, Main stem numbers per plant: 1.275-1.658 stems plant-1, Main stem thickness: 2.913-3.703 mm, Fresh forage yield: 10.43-23.83 t ha-1 and DRY MATTER YIELD: 2.525-5.891 t ha-1. GGE (i.e., G+GE) BIPLOT ANALYSIS showed that the two growing seasons were markedly different, stemming exclusively from differences in rainfall amounts between the two growing seasons. Results of this study showed that the lines 88P00-1-4-9-661 (1) and P101 (6), and cultivar Kirazli (9) were superior in terms of fresh forage yield, DRY MATTER YIELD, natural plant height and days to 50% flowering traits. At the same time, PC2 scores of these genotypes were found near to zero, so, they were identified as stable genotypes for the investigated traits. In conclusion, in terms of forage yield, these three forage pea genotypes are recommended for the KIZILTEPE PLAIN growing conditions.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAYAR, M.S., & HAN, Y.. (2016). FORAGE YIELD PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM SPP. ARVENSE L.) GENOTYPES AND ASSESSMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), 18(6), 1621-1634. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/62880/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAYAR M.S., HAN Y.. FORAGE YIELD PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM SPP. ARVENSE L.) GENOTYPES AND ASSESSMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST)[Internet]. 2016;18(6):1621-1634. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/62880/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M.S. SAYAR, and Y. HAN, “FORAGE YIELD PERFORMANCE OF FORAGE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM SPP. ARVENSE L.) GENOTYPES AND ASSESSMENTS USING GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1621–1634, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/62880/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top