مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

327
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparing Efficacy of Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) and Propidium Monoazide (PMA) qPCR in Live Pathogen Quantifying by Real-Time PCR in Food Model Systems

Pages

  377-386

Abstract

PCR quantifies dead cells beside live cells and this makes the judgment of microbial quality of food samples complicated. The objective of this study was comparing the efficacy of Ethidium monoazideqPCR and Propidium monoazide-qPCR in quantifying live Pathogen cells (E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus fecalis and Listeria monocyogenes) by real time PCR, in low-fat and high-fat milk, lactic cheese (low-fat) and processed cheese (high-fat). Different proportions of live and heat killed Pathogen cells were inoculated into food samples. After separating bacterial pellets, EMA and PMA treatments qPCR was conducted. One-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’ s Multiple Comparison tests were applied to analyze the data. In low-fat milk, EMA treatment resulted in 18, 20, 23 and 30% decrease in cell count of E. coli, S. aureus, E. fecalis and L. monocyogenes, respectively, compared to conventional culturing. Also, following treatment by PMA, 6, 3, 8 and 12% decrease in cell count was obtained for E. coli, S. aureus, E. fecalis and L. monocyogenes, respectively, compared to conventional culturing. In high-fat samples as processed cheese, a reduction of 20, 27, 30 and 25% in EMA treatment and 9, 6, 5 and 10% in PMA treatment was observed in cell count of E. coli, S. aureus, E. fecalis and L. monocyogenes, respectively. The inhibitory potential of EMA and PMA against signal emission was variable in different bacterial species and the fat content of the samples exerted no significant effect (p>0. 05) on PMA and EMA functionality.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AZIZKHANI, M., & TOORYAN, F.. (2019). Comparing Efficacy of Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) and Propidium Monoazide (PMA) qPCR in Live Pathogen Quantifying by Real-Time PCR in Food Model Systems. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 16(90 ), 377-386. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/71763/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AZIZKHANI M., TOORYAN F.. Comparing Efficacy of Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) and Propidium Monoazide (PMA) qPCR in Live Pathogen Quantifying by Real-Time PCR in Food Model Systems. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2019;16(90 ):377-386. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/71763/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. AZIZKHANI, and F. TOORYAN, “Comparing Efficacy of Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) and Propidium Monoazide (PMA) qPCR in Live Pathogen Quantifying by Real-Time PCR in Food Model Systems,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 16, no. 90 , pp. 377–386, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/71763/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button