Evaluation Residents Think about the Use of Infill Development Approaches (Case Study: New Buildings Jouybara of Isfahan)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Aminoroaya Elham; KHODABAKHSHIAN MEGHEDY

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOVIATESHAHR Year:2022 | Volume:15 | Issue:48 Page(s): 93-106

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

385

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation Residents Think about the Use of Infill Development Approaches (Case Study: New Buildings Jouybara of Isfahan)

Author(s)

Aminoroaya Elham | KHODABAKHSHIAN MEGHEDY | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Approaches to infill buildings

Infill development

New buildings

Jouybara’s contex

Residents’opinion

Abstract

Interventions in his torical contexts are taking place with different approaches throughout Iran and the world. The present s tudy was designed to answer the ques tion of what approaches should be taken in relation to residents’ viewpoints in the Jobebara neighborhood of Isfahan, which is a his torical context. For this reason, after reviewing a variety of s trategies, the residents’ opinion and their democratic intervention and social participation were selected as the appropriate research s trategies, which was tes ted through a ques tionnaire of residents’ opinions on the subject under inves tigation. The method of the present s tudy is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods so that the interpretation and analysis of various books and articles related to the field of interfacial development are placed alongside the quantitative method (ques tionnaire) in the field of analysis, and evaluation of interfacial s tructures and also for the purpose of the application. The data collection methods in this s tudy are library and field research, because the researcher firs t s tudied library resources and then field s tudies, interviewed specialis ts in the field and residents in the context by drawing visual ques tionnaires on the subject of research. To identify infill buildings, all Approaches to infill buildings include ten methods including, maximal contras t, and s tylis tic approach, s tylis tic maximum likelihood and new synergy approach, facade approach, ornamental approach, deductive approach, and line design, neutral or zero degrees, uns table architecture coexis tence, s tyle and fantasy, subtle or mirrored building approach, contextual architecture with continuity approach, hybrid approach were analyzed and then co-integration and integration approaches were analyzed. Finally, integrated approaches were decreased to 5 approaches, the approach of conflict and contras t maximum and candid s tyle, approach parallels maximum s tyle and synergy between the new and old approach, preservation of the facade approach, neutral or degree zero architectural approaches, and creating subtle or mirror New buildings, respectively. In developing the ques tionnaire, a growing number of images related to the architecture of infill buildings in his torical contexts of different parts of Iran and the world, especially the city of Isfahan, including Jouyebra, were tes ted by the Delphi method and based on five selected approaches in this field. The scores on both ques tionnaires were scored on a Likert scale (score scale), in which each image was scored from very low to very high (1-5). Then, the highes t-rated images and their ques tions were surveyed by 360 residents, and finally, 340 people were accepted and analyzed by the IBM SPSS Statis tics 25 software. Inves tigating the reliability of the variables under examination in the his torical texture of the river. It was found that the inhabitants of the neighborhood generally wanted a completely new and modern cons truction in their texture, compared to being in harmony with the exis ting texture. This means that mos t residents were unenthusias tic in the texture of their neighborhood and were looking for modernity. For this reason, the findings showed that residents’ views of reflective and mirrored approaches to New buildings to the neutral or zero degree architecture approaches ranged from highes t to lowes t, respectively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Aminoroaya, Elham, & KHODABAKHSHIAN, MEGHEDY. (2022). Evaluation Residents Think about the Use of Infill Development Approaches (Case Study: New Buildings Jouybara of Isfahan). HOVIATESHAHR, 15(48 ), 93-106. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/950970/en

Vancouver: Copy

Aminoroaya Elham, KHODABAKHSHIAN MEGHEDY. Evaluation Residents Think about the Use of Infill Development Approaches (Case Study: New Buildings Jouybara of Isfahan). HOVIATESHAHR[Internet]. 2022;15(48 ):93-106. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/950970/en

IEEE: Copy

Elham Aminoroaya, and MEGHEDY KHODABAKHSHIAN, “Evaluation Residents Think about the Use of Infill Development Approaches (Case Study: New Buildings Jouybara of Isfahan),” HOVIATESHAHR, vol. 15, no. 48 , pp. 93–106, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/950970/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

No record.