In this paper we compare the economic costs and benefits of providing the need of Tehran for electricity through two alternatives, namely transmission of gas or electricity from point of production to Tehran. The basic facts that affect the study are that there is a need to establish a power station to generate the needed electricity for Tehran as the main centre of consumption and that the main centre of gas production is located in Asalooyeh. The basic question to which this study responds is that establishing such power plant in which area between the gas production and electricity consumption centers results in lower costs. In other words, which choice between transmitting electricity and gas is most advantageous for the country.In this paper, different options of gas and electricity transmission between the closest area to the gas production center in Asalooyeh and the closest area to the electricity consumption center in Tehran are studied. Production capacity of the hypothetical power plant is taken as 1000 megawatt with maximum 1200-kilometre distance between the point of production of natural gas and Tehran.The existing electricity and gas networks of the country have been ignored and it is assumed that there is no spare capacity in either electricity or gas transmission lines. The study reviews different options, namely electricity transmission through mono-circuit and bicircuit 230 and 400 kilovolt transmission lines and gas transmission through 28, 30, 48 and 56-inch pipe lines and takes into account loss of electricity due to transmission. The best option to minimize the costs of providing the consumers with electricity in terms of the national economy is the establishment of the power plant close to the gas production center and transmission of electricity to the consumption area.