In Iran, many years before the advent of Islam, attention has been paid to trade and sea power. In Islam, since the early years, this importance has been accompanied by ups and downs during the time of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and after him. In this research, this trend has been investigated and analyzed in the form of the theory and jurisprudential rule of the negation of the Mustache. The question that is raised is, what is the role of Iranian-Islamic naval power based on the jurisprudential rule of Nefi Sebil? The obtained results show that both in the ancient period and in the Islamic period, attention was paid to the capacity and power of the sea, and during this period, attention was sometimes paid to the negation of the Mustache and the lack of dominance and superiority of foreigners in this geographical area. The method of conducting this research is descriptive-analytical and library method. In this regard, researches and articles have been carried out, and the superiority of this research is the integration of the sea power of Iran and Islam and its reliance on the jurisprudential rule of negation of the Mustache, one of the important rules of negation of the superiority and dominance of non-Muslims over Muslims, which in the period after the Islamic Revolution, is always It has been emphasized by the supreme leaders of the revolution.

BACKGROUND Surgical management of hair loss has become an increasingly challenging procedure, when dealing with scar alopecia. We investigated the efficacy of hair transplantation in patients with head and neck scar alopecia. METHODS From 2016 to 2018 in Shiraz, Iran, all patients with scar alopecia in head and neck were evaluated for efficacy of follicular unit extraction (FUE), follicular unit transplantation (FUT) or a combination of two methods from donor sites in scalp and beard various hair-grafts were compared. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were enrolled. Most of them were between 31 and 40 yr old (48. 3%) and male (71. 4%). Trauma, burn, surgical excision of adjacent skin, radiotherapy and leishmaniasis were the registered causes. Scars were visible in scalp (39. 3%), beard (28. 6%), eyebrow (21. 4%), and moustache (10. 7%) regions. FUE (87. 5%), FUT (10. 7%) and a combination (1. 8%) were the used methods. One-hair-grafts were used in eyebrows (100%), moustache (100%), beard (88%) and scalp (7. 9%), while 2-hair-grafts in beard (6%) and scalp (47. 4%) and 3-haired grafts in beard (6%) and scalp (44. 7%) transplantations. CONCLUSION In head and neck scar alopecia, hair transplantation was selected based on type and depth of scar. FUE was targeted when huge grafts were not needed, including beard, moustache, and eyebrow, while FIT was used when extensive scars were present in scalp. One-hair-grafts were mostly applied for eyebrow, moustache and beard, 2-hair-and 3-hair-grafts for beard and scalp transplantation. These findings can be added to the literature when FUE, FIT, or their combination are targeted in hair restoration of scar alopecia in head and neck.

In this research, it is devoted to the study of "the application of the rule of negation of Mustache from the viewpoint of Shiite and Sunni scholars". The findings of the research indicate that the rules and principles of the Imami jurisprudence and the jurisprudence of the four Sunni sects regarding the issue of the rule of negation of the Mustache, the principle of adherence to agreements and treaties, the rule of invitation, the rule of intimacy and brotherhood in relation to Islamic countries, peace Izzat Madar, the principle of preserving the system, Dar al-Islam and Jihad, and the viewpoints and points of view and the quality of reasoning were mentioned along with the mention of their evidence, and to reach the views of the jurists of the two religions, drawing rules and principles for it is very helpful. The results of the research showed that the Sunni experts said about the concept of negation of the Mustache, the meaning of the negation of the Mustache is the negation of proof and argument for the unbelievers on the Day of Judgment. Some said that it is negating the power that can destroy the government and the faith of the believers. Some said it is negation of enemies' rule,provided that they do not advise each other to falsehood, and give up evil deeds, and repent of their sins, and some have expressed another meaning. In Shia, according to Ibn Abbas and Yasa Hazrami,

The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as the highest legal document of the country, is the result of a wise process of research and ijtihad by jurists and jurists with an emphasis on the foundations of Shia political jurisprudence and influenced by the views of Imam Khomeini and presenting a new plan of the government system using the laws and rules of Islamic political jurisprudence. Is. The rule of negation of the Mustache is one of the jurisprudence rules which is very efficient and effective in order to realize the theory of society administration and regulation of Muslim relations in various social and personal fields, and guarantees the negation of any intellectual, social and economic tyranny, but regarding this rule, the approaches There are different ones, each of which causes different requirements regarding how to deal with non-Muslims, therefore, in this article, while reviewing these views, it answers the question that according to the different approaches to the rule of negation of the Mustache, the Islamic Republic of Iran's constitution based on Which approach has been formed and what are its requirements in how to interact with non-Muslims? research method The findings of the research indicate that the approach of the constitution to this principle is a kind of negation of conditional authority, and the interpretation of the constitution is highly oriented to the interests of the Islamic system and to the requirements of time and place.

The increase in capabilities and display of the power of the Islamic Republic in recent years, the degree of self-reliance and independence inside and outside the borders, in regional and international waters and air and space, has made Iran one of the most powerful international powers. Explaining the necessity of power and authority and increasing capabilities by approaching the rule of negation of the Mustache is a motivation to examine this title, The military-defensive-offensive component related to the display and increase of power, creation of national unity, instilling terror in the enemy in confronting the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the power of deterrence are the goals that are investigated. The findings of the research show that the influential component of defense military power and how it can be authoritatively displayed to other actors in the international arena can be proven with the approach of the negation rule based on domestic and international laws. In order to protect the country from getting into long wars and unpredictable losses and dangers in the adversities of time and space, and to achieve its goals, which is the independence of the system and imposing the will on the enemy, and to achieve it to increase the power and progress of the country. increase in the domestic and international scene. Analytical-descriptive research method and its tool is data collection and analysis in library method.

Agha Mohammad Ali Behbahani in his treatise of cheiratiya, while criticizing the general flow of Sufism, He talks about three issues: (1) Nematullahi's belief in dropping homework for the followers of the way, (2) Nematullahiyya's following from Permissible and (3) Enumerating examples of their leaving Sharia according to Shia jurisprudence. Therefore, one of his jurisprudential criticisms of the followers and poles of the way is abandoning the obligation to shorten the Mustache. The aim of the current research is to find an answer to Behbahani's criticisms regarding the adherence and place of Sharia in Nematullahi Way. This research examines the authenticity of these controversies using a library method, by describing and phenomenologically analyzing the available sources. The analysis of Nematullahi's written sources rejects the claim of scrap homework for wayfarer and poles of the path of truth. And the followers of this path of truth claim In Sharia, they follow the Prophet's (PBUH) tradition and Shia jurisprudence. In addition, in the historical recognition, Nematullahi's connection and Affectivity from Karamiya (as a Permissible proceeding) is not clear. Because the emphasis of the followers of this path of truth on following the jurists and scholars in jurisprudential matters is a sign of their adherence to Sharia and Shiite jurisprudence, at least in terms of opinion. Criticism of Mustache's jurisprudential issue is also based on tolerance in the evidence of traditions and the way of religious people that In the historical and jurisprudential reading of this issue, the reason of the critics is considered weak On the contrary, there are historical documents of wearing a Mustache in the Sunnah of Shia religious people. Therefore, in Nematullahiyyah, the Sharia have had a status equal to the scholars and jurists And Behbahani's criticisms are based on celebrities that have no historical truth or theoretical validity.

Iran, Egypt and Lebanon are among the Islamic countries where the source of family laws is "religion" and personal status in Islamic countries is based on religious rules and regulations and the examples related to it, such as marriage, are derived from religious orders. But the legal system of Lebanon has a type of marriage called civil marriage. It is recognized as a type of non-peer marriage that took place outside that country which is applied due to the conditions imposed by the religious legislature in Lebanon, which has created an obstacle for the marriage of some men and women who are from different communities or who intend to separate from each other. So, this caused some people to look for legal solutions, including civil marriage, to solve this problem. Because most of the foreign countries and some Muslim countries have approved civil marriage, either mandatory or voluntary. Therefore, with the progress of societies, social interactions and the raising of the cultural level of families, an attempt has been made in this article to reread the condition of the equality of religion and religion by looking at the change of the position of women in the family with the change of the concept of dominance and also by relying on the jurisprudential capacities of the rule of lahrij and the principles of expediency and justice, and by taking the help of civil marriage in Lebanon, the legal gaps in the legal system of Iran and Egypt should be resolved.

Sistan and Baluchestan province, as one of the most strategic provinces in the east of the country, has always caused many security incidents in different parts of the province. It emphasizes the Shiite religion as the official religion of the country, so one of the ways to achieve the indicators of convergence is the religion of Islam. The purpose of this study was to "explain the role of Islam in the integration of the Baluch people and its impact on social security in Sistan and Baluchestan province."The present study is of applied type and in terms of descriptive analytical method and statistical population as a whole and the obtained results are "Islam as the most important component of the convergence of Baluch people through the principles of common religion between Shiites and Sunnah - belief in a common prophet - belief The rule of denying the Mustache - common religious holidays, etc., has an effect on the convergence of the Baloch people.

In this article, the implications of jurisprudence rules for the policy of virtual space have been analyzed and the selection of jurisprudence rules has been made because these rules are essentially a general ruling of the stage of action and work and are one step away from implementation, and hence It is suitable for its use in policy making in different fields. The main question of the research is what these meanings are, and based on this, eight jurisprudential rules, including harm, negation of Mustache, sanctity of disruption in the system, contribution to harm, waste, expediency, bowing to rituals and warning, were analyzed and their meanings were studied. In terms of methodological paradigm, the research is a qualitative research, and data collection was done in the form of documents and libraries, and the analysis was done by the implication research method. This article shows that jurisprudence rules have specific implications for the three layers of infrastructure, service, and content.

Muslim minorities living in non-Islamic countries confront with some Islamic rules such as the” Rule of Nafy Sabil” that is a Quranic Principle in following and observing the rules of the non-Islamic countries. According to this rule, the legal authority of the infidels is regarded as domination and then it is forbidden. The present article, based on an analytical approach, is to determine the dimensions of this issue and to divide Islamic laws into permits(mobaite) and obligations. Then the stability and changeability of the Islamic decrees are specified. Concerning the nature of non-Islamic countries’ rules, different situations that are arisen from the confliction of these laws with the legal regulations are studied; and most of the principles that are categorized as permits and have acceptable criteria are exempted from the rule of Mustache refusal. Moreover, it permits following some laws that are among the obligations and are against the obligatory and forbidden Islamic rules just through considering rule constriction (negation of haraj) and conflict rule.