This article addresses resource reallocation among production PROCESSES.Proposed model is formalized in the base of Barnum and Gleason model [2]. The objective function minimizes the sum of same kind inputs. This model reallocates resource to all subunits such that DMU allocation efficiency improves and also concerns subunits efficiency. A production function is defined for any output and therefore model is generalized to multiple outputs. Also an application is investigated involving bank area.

Soils are the outermost layer of the earth's crust, and they are closely interrelated with the formation of the land on which they are formed and developed. Therefore, any change in the geomorphic PROCESSES affects the soil-forming PROCESSES. "Soil geomorphology" is an assessment of the genetic relationships between soils and landforms. Although the relationships between landforms and soils have been investigated by researchers, a quantitative evaluation of the relationship between soil and geomorphic surface has been less considered. However, the soil-geomorphology relationship is a two-way relationship, and a question arises here is that how an observed soil can indicate geomorphic surfaces or landforms? Accordingly, the current research tries to examine this issue with the use of statistics and conditional probability. For this purpose, the geomorphic units of the central region of Isfahan were delineated using geopedology approach (Zinck method) and 344 soil profiles were analyzed, and the conditional probability of the existence of each geomorphic unit was obtained on condition of observation of different soils. The findings quantitatively showed that there is a strong and close relationship between soil development and formation and the geomorphic condition, so that some soils can be found only in certain geomorphic unit. In other words, the soil is an indicator/unique soil for the geomorphic unit. Due to the similar relationship between the geomorphical levels and the soil taxonomical levels, the diversity increased as the taxonomical levels increased from orders to the families. Also, the findings showed slightly in the study area that the effect of "landforms and topography" on the development and formation of soils is more than parent material...

In this research, based on a descriptive-analytical method, some quasifrequency phonological PROCESSES in Russian are investigated and compared with what is happening in Persian. Phonological PROCESSES are the effects of neighboring phonemes in words of a language, although these PROCESSES can occur in unpolluted phonemes and sometimes between the two words. One of the most important and complex topics studied in phonology is phonological PROCESSES. Each of these PROCESSES may be more frequent in one language than another, or, depending on the particular phonetic features of a language, it may not be possible a phonological process or particular type of a phonological process. These PROCESSES occur in fewer or more frequencies depending on their specific phonetic features in all languages of the world. The questions we are looking for in this article are: What are the phonological PROCESSES of Russian and Persian languages? Despite the phonetic differences between the Russian and Persian languages, are there similarities between the phonological PROCESSES of these two languages? What are the differences between the phonological PROCESSES of these two languages? The research hypothesis is that phonological PROCESSES in Russian and Persian languages are not fully compatible. In this article, first, some of the phonological PROCESSES are described in Russian, and then the same process is examined in Persian language. The purpose of this analysis is to answer the research question that finds similarities and differences in phonological PROCESSES in two languages by studying and comparing the exact phonological PROCESSES of the two languages. Many phonological PROCESSES, such as the “ assimilation” , the “ metathesis” , “ dissimilation” in the Russian and Persian languages, are similar, but some of them, like “ assimilation of soft consonants” and “ dieresis” in Persian due to its specific phonetic features can’ t be occur. The phonological process of “ vowel and Consonant harmony with manner of articulation” in Persian is examined in the section “ assimilation” and is known as “ consonant assimilation” and “ vowel assimilation” in the Persian language, whereas in Russian since vowels and consonants refer to sounds of different types and to the end, as a rule, they cannot be assimilated to each other and the term “ assimilation” cannot be applied to them. The phonological process of “ regressive assimilation of soft consonants” that occurs in Russian is not possible in Persian because there are fifteen pairs of hard and soft consonants in Russian (thirty consonants in total) and some paired hard consonants become soft in specific situations; but in Persian, there is no paired soft consonant with their hard counterparts.