Background and Objective: The main aim in medical education is teaching students to carry out certain duties in future. The RESTORATIVE Dentistry is a very important dental practice in our country. The aim of this study was to determine General Dentistry RESTORATIVE curriculum's adaptation to RESTORATIVE dentistry service needs in community.Materials and Methods: In this quantitative cross‐sectional study consisting of two phases, data was gathered by two valid and reliable checklists. In first phase, the RESTORATIVE dental services of 1027 patients in a dental clinic sampled over a period of three months were analyzed by statistical software SPSS.17 and the results were reported. In the second phase, we provided a list of syllabuses and RESTORATIVE lessons with summarized results of the first phase to Tehran and Shahed University RESTORATIVE faculty members and asked them to express their views about General Dentistry RESTORATIVE curriculum's adaptation to the analyzed needs in last phase and results were reported.Results: In first phase, 2362 cases of the RESTORATIVE service were considered. The results showed that all the syllabuses of RESTORATIVE curriculum met the RESTORATIVE needs of the patients. But the amount of time allocated to teaching “theoretical cardiology” and “practical RESTORATIVE dentistry3” did not meet the students' needs.Conclusion: RESTORATIVE lessons syllabus was suitable but time was not sufficient. So the amount of time of teaching should be added to fix the deficiency, so that the quality of education can be promoted. For this purpose using new methods of education via educational package, films and modules may be useful.

RESTORATIVE justice is a term used in recent decades in criminal policy, which has received unprecedented acclaim as in any other emerging theory and phenomenon. They have since emerged, and efforts are still underway to continue and develop these effects within the criminal justice system. However, it seems to us that the time has come for the sheer submission of effective and effective expertise on imported and emerging theories and their practical implications, although the criminal justice system of our country has already experienced such Adoption of issues such as conditional release, suspended sentence, imprisonment alternatives and the like has benefited, and should not be seen as a reason for the successful adoption of any import theory and its operation. The authors criticize the RESTORATIVE justice approach and after examining the criticisms of RESTORATIVE justice in the two areas of nature and results of programs, the inadequacy of its models and programs and the need for a comprehensive review of RESTORATIVE justice challenges And they turned to the opportunity and made suggestions. The method of information orientation in this article is a library and the materials are analyzed in a descriptive manner.

"RESTORATIVE Justice" is a new model in criminal justice which emphasizes on reviving of the victim's rights and settling the problems arised from the commission of offences with active participation of the victim and community and also offender via negotiation and reparation of damages and making peace among them. "Reconciliation" is one of important and emphatic procedures in Islam in case of disputes and divergences, which is done with participation of all people in the Islamic society and free participating of the dispute parties. This essay, meanwhile, intends to study the concept of "Reconciliation", its characteristics, and the adaptability of "RESTORATIVE Justice" with this concept and performance of "RESTORATIVE Justice" under the light of "Reconciliation".

I read with great interest the series presented by Bananzadeh et al. (1). This series includes a group of 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic RESTORATIVE proctocolectomy (RPC) without ileostomy, performed by the same surgeon, to treat Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) between October 2008 and May 2011. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently the standard surgical alternative for the majority of ulcerative colitis (UC) and FAP patients. Despite the complexity of the operation, IPAA is safe (mortality: 0.5–1%) and carries an acceptable risk of non-life-threatening complications (10–25%), achieving good long-term functional outcomes with excellent patient satisfaction (over 95%). During the last decade, the surgical technique has evolved significantly, mainly due to the growing incorporation of laparoscopic approaches. Because it is a complex technical procedure, a temporary ileostomy proximal to the ileal pouch has typically been performed (2). Thus, the most controversial aspect of the study discussed here being the omission of ileostomy in a series of laparoscopic surgeries. A protective ileostomy may reduce anastomosis leakage, prevent pelvic sepsis and fistulization, thus preserving pouch function. Consequently, it should also prevent the need for re-laparotomy and most importantly, pouch failure.The rationale for this decision is based on the fact that a protective ileostomy may limit the severity of septic complications, as the prevalence of pouch-related septic complications varies between 6% and 37% (2). Furthermore, most patients are able to accept this temporary stoma well, although it may be a source of complications after its construction or closure.These complications may include dehydration and metabolic disorders, peristomal irritation, anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction, and others (3).

This article has no abstract.