Following the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and the establishment of governments based on the people's votes, due to the long-standing religious and cultural ties between the peoples of Iran and Iraq, the ground for Iran's activism in the geopolitics of this country was provided. Iran's regional policy, while observing the principles of good neighborliness and non-interference, has taken a special and strategic view of these developments and has acted in an effort to secure national interests. In this regard, three patterns regarding Iran's activism in Iraq's geopolitics are proposed, which include the pattern of passive activism or non-participation, interactive activism, and activism based on soft power and economic links. Examining these three patterns and the advantages and disadvantages associated with each one, and analysis regarding which pattern will be more likely to provide Iran's national interests are the main topics of this article. Based on the results of this research, Iran can have a unique position in Iraq's geopolitics due to its relative advantages compared to other actors. Based on this, an effective regional policy to deepen the relations between Iran and Iraq, on the one hand, is focused on social relations that are rooted in culture, religion, language and common race, and on the other hand, it is focused on deepening economic relations and establishing mutual dependence.  .

Climate litigation and judicial activism have become key instruments to tackle the climate crisis due to the lack of appropriate legislative or executive action. The study examines judicial activism through the lens of constitutional- and rights-related cases and its implications for some aspects of climate policies and environmental protection. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze more than 1,000 climates ‘litigation cases’ from a variety of jurisdictions. Judicial opinions were subjected to qualitative content analysis, and quantitative models estimated the relationship between judicial activism and emissions reductions. Data sources include judicial rulings, international agreements and interviews with legal experts. North America has the highest absolute number of cases, as well as the largest share of cases in which any of these treaties are invoked that also mention corporate defendants. Next comes Europe a country of heavy relative dependence on constitutional claims and arguments rooted in human rights. In South America and Africa there are many more recent cases involving indigenous claims and other human rights claims, perhaps suggesting increasing awareness about the climate impacts on vulnerable communities. Courts are bridging gaps in legislative and executive action and shaping policy and setting legal precedents as courts take a more prominent role in the global fight over climate change.Climate litigation and judicial activism have become key instruments to tackle the climate crisis due to the lack of appropriate legislative or executive action. The study examines judicial activism through the lens of constitutional- and rights-related cases and its implications for some aspects of climate policies and environmental protection. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze more than 1,000 climates ‘litigation cases’ from a variety of jurisdictions. Judicial opinions were subjected to qualitative content analysis, and quantitative models estimated the relationship between judicial activism and emissions reductions. Data sources include judicial rulings, international agreements and interviews with legal experts. North America has the highest absolute number of cases, as well as the largest share of cases in which any of these treaties are invoked that also mention corporate defendants. Next comes Europe a country of heavy relative dependence on constitutional claims and arguments rooted in human rights. In South America and Africa there are many more recent cases involving indigenous claims and other human rights claims, perhaps suggesting increasing awareness about the climate impacts on vulnerable communities. Courts are bridging gaps in legislative and executive action and shaping policy and setting legal precedents as courts take a more prominent role in the global fight over climate change.Climate litigation and judicial activism have become key instruments to tackle the climate crisis due to the lack of appropriate legislative or executive action. The study examines judicial activism through the lens of constitutional- and rights-related cases and its implications for some aspects of climate policies and environmental protection. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze more than 1,000 climates ‘litigation cases’ from a variety of jurisdictions. Judicial opinions were subjected to qualitative content analysis, and quantitative models estimated the relationship between judicial activism and emissions reductions. Data sources include judicial rulings, international agreements and interviews with legal experts. North America has the highest absolute number of cases, as well as the largest share of cases in which any of these treaties are invoked that also mention corporate defendants. Next comes Europe a country of heavy relative dependence on constitutional claims and arguments rooted in human rights. In South America and Africa there are many more recent cases involving indigenous claims and other human rights claims, perhaps suggesting increasing awareness about the climate impacts on vulnerable communities. Courts are bridging gaps in legislative and executive action and shaping policy and setting legal precedents as courts take a more prominent role in the global fight over climate change.Climate litigation and judicial activism have become key instruments to tackle the climate crisis due to the lack of appropriate legislative or executive action. The study examines judicial activism through the lens of constitutional- and rights-related cases and its implications for some aspects of climate policies and environmental protection. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze more than 1,000 climates ‘litigation cases’ from a variety of jurisdictions. Judicial opinions were subjected to qualitative content analysis, and quantitative models estimated the relationship between judicial activism and emissions reductions. Data sources include judicial rulings, international agreements and interviews with legal experts. North America has the highest absolute number of cases, as well as the largest share of cases in which any of these treaties are invoked that also mention corporate defendants. Next comes Europe a country of heavy relative dependence on constitutional claims and arguments rooted in human rights. In South America and Africa there are many more recent cases involving indigenous claims and other human rights claims, perhaps suggesting increasing awareness about the climate impacts on vulnerable communities. Courts are bridging gaps in legislative and executive action and shaping policy and setting legal precedents as courts take a more prominent role in the global fight over climate change.