Introduction: This article's objective is to explain slip distribution on faults and understanding further the processes of earthquakes and fault slip, and how they are related. Yet, rare were the studies that tried to compare these slip distributions. Few studies did so, but mainly focused on characterizing the earthquake slip complexity. The overall slip distribution patterns were not considered. Hence, the questions related to the average shape of earthquake slip distributions are still opened.The profiles of maximum and mean slip that extracted from the models in this article allow total slip variations along both fault strike and dip to be studied. The general idea that followed is that analyzing many earthquakes together provides a way of smoothing their individual peculiarities (such as specific slip complexities), so that common, general properties, may emerge.Aim: The present study investigated characterizing average slip distributions on earthquakes beyond their individual heterogeneity.Methods: An auto correlation method was used to define an effective length at which zones of zero (or small) slip is not contributing, even when localized between slip patches. A collection of one-dimensional profiles was prepared, each is given as D(x) (D is displacement or slip; x is position along fault length or width). Hence, all profiles are mathematically comparable and can be analyzed similarly, with a general procedure.Results: While earthquakes are complex features with highly heterogeneous mechanical conditions on their planes (due to pre-stresses, static and dynamic stress loading/unloading by neighboring ruptures, host rock properties, etc…), they share some common, generic properties that appear when a large number of events are examined together: most produce triangular slip profiles (»70% are asymmetric) with well defined, long linear tapers. Triangular slip distributions on earthquake faults seem to be self-similar, suggesting that they attest to a scale-invariant mechanical behavior. Most slip profiles are asymmetric, suggesting different behaviors at the two edges of the major asperity.Conclusion: The maximum and mean slip profiles draw a triangular and asymmetric average curve, while three dominant degrees of asymmetry are revealed. The observation of triangular slip distributions therefore attests to a common, general property of faults, regardless of their scales and kinematics. The area broken during this “first stage” appears as the “major asperity” that shapes the total triangular slip distribution.Most of the moment is released by rupture of this area. This rupture produces dynamic stress overshoot in the surrounding fault plane. This overshoot makes some unfavorably stressed (or in inappropriate energetic conditions) portions of the fault plane in conditions to slip. The linear trends in the final slip profile are taken to be associated with the progressive dissipation of the energy provided by the dynamic rupture of the main asperity.