During three last decades, some modem ethical philosophers, called communitarians, reviving Aristotelian virtualistic ethics, have criticized intensively ethical and political views of utilitarian and new - Kantian liberalism. This doctrine, emphasizing on political, ethical and psychological importance of correlations to societies, believes that ethical arguments and judgments must derive from context of cultural perceptions and traditions. In this writing, we will indicate that the
thought, committing simultaneously to two percepts of virtualistic ethic and communal identities, has been contradicted, since the first percept, firstly, with its reference in this thought to Aristotelian objectivism in ethical sphere; secondly, with defending by its supporter to release the accusation of relativism, eventually has to be referred to a type of ethical universalism - although in thin. Ethical percepts - while the second percept, communal identity, is the consequence of ethical particularistic.