The purpose of this study was to investigate the problems of methodological research program in the history of political thought appearing valuation methodologies. The claim is that the principles and methodology of the research program evaluate the formation, expansion, and development of methodologies in the area of knowledge. In contrast, this article argues that the research program is not sufficient because the emphasis on the construction logic can provide understanding and assessment of the methodology. Hence, it is in the realm of theory and interpretation to meet numerous methodological problems: Problems within the scope of that program to the issue of the formation of the methodology, as well as during the formation of speech acts do not prescribe significantly. In the realm of theory, political theory after normative ignored and only focused on the causes. In the area of interpretation, it is not able to scale phenomenon as old as innovation and the presence of artifacts and interpretation to distinguish. Because of that, any innovation requires that the phenomena in terms of time in the past is not testable, exploring the phenomenon can not be considered a new interpretation. Therefore, the research program is lack of attention to the internal logic of thought and methodology and involves three problems in methodology, theory and application of that methodology, the interpretation, and to address these issues, which have undergone a fundamental change, not mayhem and adjustments to be temporary.