THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL
Year:2014 | Volume:78 | Issue:85|Papers Count:7

In criminal law, entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit a criminal offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit. It is a type of conduct that is generally frowned upon, and thus in many jurisdictions is a possible defense against criminal liability.Depending on the law in the jurisdiction, the prosecution may be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not entrapped or the defendant may be required to prove that they were entrapped as an affirmative defense.The entrapment defense in the United States has evolved mainly through case law. Two competing tests exist for determining whether entrapment has taken place, known as the “subjective” and “objective” tests. The “subjective” test looks at the defendant's state of mind; entrapment can be claimed if the defendant had no “predisposition” to commit the crime. The “objective” test looks instead at the government's conduct; entrapment occurs when the actions of government officers would usually have caused a normally law-abiding person to commit a crime.

The civil law for the short sale of constructed edifices, which can be seen in light of support in favor of the advance purchaser, was passed by the Islamic Legislative Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the month of Day 1389 (A.H.) and subsequently gained the approval of the Guardian Council. From the very beginning the legal character of the legislation, especially with regard to its first constituent article, proved highly controversial. The present paper, aiming to clarify the legislative character of this law, scrutinizes these issues and in the course of disputing the necessity of the reception of the total amount due in concordant transaction, reaches the final conclusion that the law is harmonious and in accordance with such transaction, this being conditioned by the presupposition that the contract observe the first article of the legislative law and state in writing that the edifice under agreement be transferred into the possession of the purchaser either “from the beginning,” “during the course of construction” or “after the completion of the edifice.” In the first instance the transfer will be unconditionally complete; in the second instance the transfer will be in a state of conditional pending and in accordance with the number of installments; and in the final instance the transfer will be in a state of conditional pending completed after the payment of the final installment.

The shift from “identify the right” to the “rights enforcement”, About concepts related to human rights in the twentieth century it reached its full. Social security rights of the categories that have been in the process, has played a mportant role. Social Security is a fundamental human right. So in this respect for the rights of individuals, need mechanisms to be predicted. This research focus on the concept of the social security right and And that social security, are both human rights and part of the civil rights, in the light of international human rights instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the Court of Human Rights in Europe have important contributions to the Human Rights evolution and grant these rights are guaranteed and pays the right to social security hearing ability. The results of this comparative study, the right to social security in the UK shows that the right to social trial in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been the failure such as there is not specific forums to address claims that is social security. For this reason Insured persons in social organization and other organizations and funds about competent authority to deal with complaints in the insurance and protection are confused and Today many countries have witnessed a change in the nature of the right to social assistance, a reflection of a right or legitimate claim to a personal right or legal right. Social assistance is not considered legal in our country. Article 29 of the constitution, which, like other human rights instruments “Benefit from social security” as “the right of everyone” knows, largely not realized it needs serious review of laws and regulations related to it.

In the legal- political system of Iran, resolving dispute and regulation of the powers relations, especially on thirty five years of the Islamic Republic history that led into the revision and modification of the Constitution, is special and unique issue that derived from the power distribution type in governance system of this country. Disputes and conflict jurisdictions problems sometimes results in unprecedented disputations that indicates different explanations from law. In recent years, this problem, despite some apparently regards again brought back into the political arena, thus it seriously required to be redesigned and fixed. The Leader created “Supreme institution of resolving dispute and regulation of the threefold powers relation” in the political arena of country based on paragraph 7 of Article 110 of the Constitution, in culmination of disputes between the threefold powers. Research in this newly established institution and review of paragraph 7 of article 110 of the Constitution as basic system of the resolving dispute and regulation of the powers relations in Iran make the main subject in this essay.

Temporary act (or law) is a law which its validity terminates by termination of period that is determined in the same act. So, this law is rescinded without enacting a “repealing act”. Non-temporary acts are rescinded only by enacting repealing acts. Although the legislator can repeal temporary laws in the period of their validity, he can repeal all laws in any time. Because the validity of laws is not an eternal matter.Inside of temporary and non-temporary acts there are circumstantial laws; some acts are depend circumstances for which they were enacted. Thus by termination of those circumstances those laws may not be enforced. As such these types of laws are in fact temporary; albeit their validity period is not determined. But circumstantial and temporary acts are rescinded by expiring their period and without enacting repealing law. Therefore, those laws may not be forced by termination of those circumstances.

Sometimes a person because of bodily or mental situation needs the care of other person,For this reason, in other legal systems the authority of control of this persones has been given to the some of the person,In this cases if the person under care dameges to another , the person that care of this person is responsible, In French law the article 1384 of civil law has pointed to the liability of the parents, In Iranian law, the article 7 of tort law has pointed to liability of guardian of infant and mad, But it is imaginable that the other persons need the care like the persons blinds or the prsons weaks or the persons ills that theire guardians whether natural person or legal person are responsible, that it has been pointed in other systems but in Iranian law there is no compensation , It seems that it is possible the designing the rule of the liability of the guardian of the acts of the persons under care that comprativly is be studied in this article.