Ujrat ul Misl (compensation for one’ s work) of the tenant or manager in managing other’ s property is among issues about which the law has remained silent just as it has been silent about other related issues such as civil liability, characteristics of manager, conditions for managing the property and conditions of the property being managed, etc. This paper, using the descriptive-analytical method, seeks to prove that, based on verses of the Quran, manager of other’ s property does not deserve to receive Ujrat ul Misl. In view of most jurists and scholars, the main reason for Hisbah is the verses related to Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong. Apart from several verses in which there is the term “ Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong” , it seems that other verses, including even verses related to managing other’ s property can be considered verses of Hisbah, given the extension of the concept of Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong by some jurists and thinkers who deem Hisbah the same thing as Enjoining Good and Forbidding Wrong. May be it could be said that based on the principle of respect for action, manager deserves Ujrat ul Misl of his action. However, the main purpose is studying if manager deserves Ujrat ul Misl based on verses of the Quran and God has frequently promised great reward in the Hereafter for His servants and described Himself as the greatest Muhasib (bookkeeper).