Extend Abstract:Introduction: Development of human settlements and the creation of an appropriate system and network unsafely in the development process can cause spatial justice, urban and rural space narrowing, strengthening the link urban and rural and finally merge them and changes in economic conditions, social, physical lead and comprehensive development and to create stability. Accordingly, the villages in its transformation process at the time of emergence, growth and long to have survived. In the process of integrating it with other villages and integration within the cities or population growth, the city began to have a new life. Some villages still have to survive as a rural settlement. Another group of villages with changing economic conditions - social and technological developments, have passed the decline and over are faced with population decline. As city of Miandoaab in most Iranian cities, rapid development in the 1980S to 2000S is the integration of eight villages surrounding the city. Therefore, this study investigates the effects and consequences of economic, social and physical integration of eight villages of Qareveran, Tghiabad, Valiabad, Behykandi, Vakilkandi, Bashirkandi, Ebrahom Nayebkandi and Yuzbashkandi is paid in the Miandoaab city and satisfaction after the inhabitants of these villages have been merged in the city.Methodology: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the consequences of the merger is in the village. With a descriptive - analytical to explain effects of physical, social and economic of cultural integration is mentioned in the study villages. Two methods for data collection and survey documents have been used. The documentary method, to identify factors affecting the integration process and evaluate the comparative effects of integration in the village, is separately incorporated settlements. The survey method using observation, interviews (city officials and council), and questionnaires completed by 260 households in eight settlements mentioned have been merged. Information obtained from questionnaires completed by families residing in incorporated villages, using SPSS statistical software and T-test and descriptive statistics and statistical analysis has been analyzed.Result and Discussion: Results show that the views of residents, the maximum and minimum positive impact of physical integration villages in the city, with 72.3 and 14.5 percent, respectively increase quality of asphalt pavements and improve the shape of doors and windows. However, the maximum and minimum negative impact on the physical integration with 62 and 41.3 percent respectively is tissue changes settlements and separated development of land. in the social aspect the views of residents, the maximum and minimum positive impact of social integration villages in the city, with 89.8 and 31.2 percent respectively, improving quality of life and reduce the tendency to migrate to the city. However, the maximum and minimum negative impact of social integration villages in the city, with 58.5 and 3.2 percent respectively, increasing urbanization and the fading of social participation. Also in the economic aspect the views of residents, the maximum and minimum positive impact of economic integration villages in the city, with 59.8 and 10.8 percent respectively, increasing land prices and increasing number of industrial and semi industrial workshops. However, the maximum and minimum negative impact of economic integration villages in the city, with 81.8 and 38.8 percent respectively, Increasing costs of living and withdrawal of government support and assistance to the villagers. According to tests conducted overall the visual effects mentioned families in rural settlements merger integration is positive. Comments of the municipality and city council officials, the advantages and disadvantages of merging the village in the city, indicated that the benefits of integration between their villages, in the city terms of creating jobs and increasing the administrative, commercial and services, promoting culture, urbanization and rising levels of culture and information to help people enhance the survival of the population living in cities and attract a limited number of rural migrants, facilities and institutions to create new services, improving the physical condition of the city, garbage collection, construction of housing and commercial units and construction management, construction of protective facilities in the city and its surroundings and provide some services from the municipality, there is consensus and also, in terms of disadvantages, such as rising housing prices and speculation, rising expectations of people, cut off some aid and government support, which is rural. The officials, council members and families into settlements, there is consensus. Views of officials and households living in integration of rural disadvantage in decisions and policies can usually be resolved. Integration between villages in the city (in terms of physical size, economic and social) integration, and distance to downtown and village development plans for city development (physical development - physical) there is a significant relationship. Because, the more time passes from the merger of the village in the city, the number of facilities and services in urban settlements than before the merger and the increased quality of services, particularly administrative services - credit and health - health has improved and villages that have a distance less than the city center, further development and integration of urban services have benefited more than other villages. As a result, more households have been accepted by the population.Conclusion: The results of the findings show that the maximum benefits Integrated of village in the city is the physical and the economic aspect is the minimum advantaged. While conversely, the maximum disadvantage is the economic aspect of integration in the village in the city and the physical aspect is the minimum disadvantages. This indicated that the integration of anatomical changes and increased services in rural areas in urban settlements has been the integration of other dimensions and in rural areas in the city benefits from the integration of anatomical, between authorities and households sampled, there is more consensus. Also the results show, however that the majority of responses stated that Guyana and the positive effects of integration in their village has negative effects and consequences and satisfied. This action has yet been able to meet all the expectations of residents. Therefore, it seems to create and deploy the necessary infrastructure for development in similar areas the integration process in the village and the legal infrastructure to support economic investment and prosperity in business is essential.