absence of a clear idea of the concept of "historiographical text", has difficulty with theorizing and conceptualization in the theoretical field of history and its subsidiaries. This problem also has involved researchers of the history of historiography in difficulty and confusion in the detection and investigation of instances of historiographical texts. To address this problem, it is assumed there are types of written works that are considered as historiographical texts, based on an unstated consensus. These works were named "model texts". Afterwards, The quality of intentionality in these texts, was considered as a criterion for evaluation of these written works' identity. Some historical circumstances as well as the teachings of the philosophy of science, are justifying the application of the intentionality criteria in this role. This is Intentionality and quality of this criteria (components) in the model text; Intentionality, was considered corresponding to the researcher mentality of the problem and how to resolve it. Historiographer's problem, was considered as discovering how to occur an event and representation of the event in a historical narrative, treated as answer, explanation and justification of the problem. Quality of intentionality of texts such as Tabaghat, Amval, KHaraj, biography, genealogy and Mazar are different from historiographical texts and thus the identity of these works, were evaluated heterogeneous with historiographical texts.