Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Year:2023 | Volume:11 | Issue:6|Papers Count:8

despite the numerous specializations and subspecialties in medicine, many medical conditions require innovative treatment approaches. . . .

Objectives: Cases of severe lower limb injuries that previously were amenable only to amputation can now, in certain circumstances, be managed with reconstruction. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to compare the results of amputation and reconstruction in severe lower extremity injuries. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) were comprehensively searched for studies comparing amputation and reconstruction for severe lower extremity injuries. The search terms used were the following: “, amputation”, , “, reconstruction”, , “, salvage”, , “, lower limb”, , “, lower extremity”, , and “, mangled limb”, , “, mangled extremity”, , “, mangled foot”, . Two investigators screened eligible studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data from each study. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager Software (RevMan, Version 5. 4). The I2 index was used to assess heterogeneity. Results: Fifteen studies with 2, 732 patients were included. Amputation is associated with lower rehospitalization rates, lower length of stay in the hospital, lower number of operations and additional surgery and fewer cases of infection and osteomyelitis. Limb reconstruction leads to faster return to work and lower rates of depression. The outcomes with respect to function and pain are variable among the studies. Statistically significance was achieved only with regards to rehospitalization and infection rates. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that amputation yields better outcomes in variables during the early postoperative period, while reconstruction is associated with improved outcomes in certain long-term parameters. Severe lower limb injuries should be managed on their individual merit. The results of this study may be a useful tool to aid in the decision-making for the treating surgeon. High-quality Randomized Controlled Studies are still required to further our conclusions.

Objectives: There have been conflicting reports regarding the effects of obesity on both surgical time and blood loss following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Varying categories of obesity has made comparison amongst existing studies difficult. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive anatomic shoulder arthroplasty cases (aTSA) was undertaken. Demographic data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), age-adjusted Charleson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), operative time, hospital length of stay (LOS), and both POD#1 and discharge visual analogue score (VAS) was collected. Intra-operative total blood volume loss (ITBVL) and need for transfusion was calculated. BMI was categorized as non-obese (<30 kg/m2), obese (30-40 kg/m2) and morbidly obese (≥, 40 kg/m2). Unadjusted associations of BMI with operative time, ITBVL and LOS were examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with hospital LOS. Results: There were 130 aTSA cases performed, including 45 short stem and 85 stemless implants, of which 23 (17. 7%) were morbidly obese, 60 (46. 2%) were obese and 47 (36. 1%) were non-obese. Median operative time for the morbidly obese cohort was 119. 5 minutes (IQR 93. 0, 142. 0) versus 116. 5 minutes (IQR 99. 5, 134. 5) for the obese cohort versus 125. 0 minutes (IQR, 99. 0, 146. 0) for the non-obese cohort. (P=0. 61) The median ITBVL for the morbidly obese cohort was 235. 8 ml (IQR 144. 3, 329. 7) versus 220. 1 ml (IQR 147. 7, 262. 7) for the obese cohort versus 216. 3 ml (IQR 139. 7, 315. 5) for the non-obese cohort. (P=0. 72). BMI ≥, 40kg/m2 (IRR 1. 32, P=0. 038), age (IRR 1. 01, P=0. 026), and female gender (IRR 1. 54, P<0. 001) were predictive of increased LOS. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital medical complications (P=0. 13), surgical complications (P=1. 0), need for re-operation (P=0. 66) and 30-day return to the ER (P=0. 06). Conclusion: Morbid obesity was not associated with increased surgical time, ITBVL and perioperative medical or surgical complications following aTSA, though it was predictive of increased hospital LOS.

Objectives: This study examines the pattern of muscular contraction and the intensity of this contraction of the biceps and triceps following elbow surgery. Methods: We performed a prospective electromyographic study of 16 patients undergoing 19 surgical procedures on the elbow joint. We measured the resting EMG signal intensity of the biceps and triceps of the operated and the normal sides at 90 degrees. We then calculated the peak EMG signal intensity during passive elbow flexion and extension of the operated side. Results: Seventeen of 19 elbows (89%) displayed a co-contraction pattern of the biceps and triceps near the end of flexion and extension during the passive range of motion. The co-contraction pattern was observed near the end of the range of motion in both flexion and extension. In addition to the observed co-contraction patterns, we detected higher contraction intensities for the biceps and triceps muscles in all patients in both flexion and extension for the elbows, which had been treated surgically. Further analysis suggests an inverse correlation between the biceps contraction intensity and the arc of motion measured at the latest follow-up. Conclusion: The co-contraction pattern and increased contraction intensity of periarticular muscle groups may result in internal splinting mechanisms, contributing to the development of elbow joint stiffness, which is frequently observed following elbow surgery.

Objectives: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASDe) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi) are potential long-term complications after lumbar fusion with rigid instrumentation. Dynamic fixation techniques (Topping-off) adjacent to the fused segments have been developed to curtail the risk of ASDe and ASDi. The current study sought to investigate whether the addition of dynamic rod constructs (DRC) in patients with preoperative degeneration in the adjacent disc was effective in reducing the risk of ASDi. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 207 patients with degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD) from January 2012 to January 2019, who underwent posterior transpedicular lumbar fusion (without Topping-off, NoT/O), and posterior dynamic instrumentation with DRC. Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and lumbar radiographs one, three, and 12 months postoperatively and annually. ASDe was defined as disc height collapse > 20% and disc wedging > 5. Patients with confirmed ASDe and aggravation of ODI > 20 or VAS score > 5 at final follow-up were diagnosed as ASDi. The Kaplan-Meier hazard method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of ASDi within 63 months of surgery. Results: Over three years of follow-up, 65 patients in the NoT/O (59. 6%) and 52 cases (53. 1%) in the DRC groups met the diagnostic criteria for ASDe. Furthermore, 27 (24. 8%) patients in the NoT/O group showed ASDi during the follow-up, compared to 14 (14. 3%) cases in the DRC group (P=0. 059). Revision surgery was performed on 19 individuals in the NoT/O and 8 cases in the DRC groups (P=0. 048). The Cox regression model identified a significantly decreased risk of ASDi if DRC was used (Hazard ratio: 0. 29,95% CI: 0. 13-0. 6). Conclusion: Dynamic fixation adjacent to the fused segment is an effective strategy for preventing ASDi in carefully selected individuals with preoperative degenerative changes at the adjacent level.

Objectives: Intertrochanteric fracture is a common fracture that mainly occurs in the elderly. Diverse pain management strategies have been applied,however, considering the age of the patients, analgesia-related complications should be concisely considered. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of Ketorolac plus placebo versus Ketorolac plus magnesium sulfate for pain management in intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: The current randomized clinical trial has been conducted on 60 patients with intertrochanteric fractures assigned into two groups of treatment with Ketorolac (30 mg) plus placebo (n=30) versus Ketorolac (30 mg) plus magnesium sulfate (15 mg/kg) (n=30). Pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS), hemodynamic parameters, and complications (nausea and vomiting) were assessed at baseline and within 20, 40, and 60 minutes after the interventions. Additional morphine sulfate requirements were compared between the groups. Results: Demographic characteristics in both groups were similar (P>0. 05). All the assessments showed statistically significantly less pain severity in the magnesium sulfate/Ketorolac group (P<0. 05), except for the baseline assessments (P=0. 873). The two groups did not differ regarding hemodynamic parameters, nausea, and vomiting complaints (P>0. 05). Although the frequency of additional morphine sulfate requirement was not different between the groups (P=0. 06), the administered dose of morphine sulfate was significantly higher in those treated with ketorolac/placebo (P=0. 002). Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, Ketorolac alone or in combination with magnesium sulfate led to significant pain reduction in patients with intertrochanteric fractures admitted to the emergency ward,however, the combination therapy had superior outcomes. Further studies are strongly recommended.

Objectives: Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) are commonly used osteotomy techniques for the symptomatic knee osteoarthritis treatment. However, there is no consensus on which method provides superior outcomes. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes, radiologic outcomes, and postoperative complications of these techniques. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 76 patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and associated varus malalignment were randomized into the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (n=38). The primary outcome measures were knee function evaluated by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and knee pain assessed by a visual analog scale. The secondary outcome measures were posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial bone varus angle, and postoperative complications. Results: Both techniques significantly improved the clinical and radiologic outcome measures. The mean improvement of total KOOS was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OPHTO groups (P=0. 55). Moreover, the improvement in various KOOS subscales was not significantly different between the two groups. The mean improvement of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was not significantly different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups (P=0. 89). The mean PTS change was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0. 34). The mean improvement of the varus angle was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0. 28). The rate of postoperative complications was not remarkably different between the CWHTO and OWHTO groups. Conclusion: Considering no observed superiority of each osteotomy technique over the other one, two techniques could be used interchangeably and based on the surgeon's preference.

The number of spine surgeries around the world is increasing in recent years. Each time, new techniques and minimal invasive procedures are developing. However, the incidence of postoperative spinal infections (PSII) ranges from 0. 7% to 20%. In cases of infection, identification of the pathogen is essential to apply the appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Most of the usual techniques are based on the recovery of samples from the periprosthetic tissue followed by inoculation in culture media. In the last years, the presence of biofilm-forming bacteria has increased, which has the ability to decrease the sensitivity of the traditional culture method. The application of sonication prior to culture on the rescued inert material, disrupts the biofilm and generates a significantly higher recovery of bacterial growth compared to conventional tissue culture. We present a case series from our service of patients undergoing apparently aseptic lumbar spine revision surgery with positive culture by sonication.