Introduction: The most common method of choice for orthopedic lower extremity surgery is intrathecal anesthesia. Despite the benefits of using spinal anesthesia, this method has complications such as headache in the acute postoperative period. Therefore, this study aims to compare Madin and Parmadin methods. The incidence of PDPH (Post-Dural-puncture headache) in patients undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery was performed by spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was performed on 60 orthopedic surgery patients referred to Pimayeh Hospital in Jahrom. Inclusion criteria included expressing consent to participate in the study, ASA class 1 and 2, no migraine and chronic headaches, no cardiovascular disease, no coagulation disease. Patients accidentally throwing coins into two groups 1) Medin And 2) paramedins were divided. Vital signs were recorded before and after spinal anesthesia at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 minutes during surgery and in recovery. PDPH was collected in patients after surgery for 7 days and once a day by an uninformed person in the form of a questionnaire. After collecting data, the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software version 21. To report descriptive statistics, qualitative variables were reported using frequency and percentage, and quantitative data were reported using mean and standard deviation. Analysis of variance with repeated measures and Chi-square test were used. P <0. 05 will be considered as a significant level. Results: A total of 60 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were evaluated by spinal anesthesia in the age range of 16 to 90 years (in two groups of 30). In pre-spinal anesthesia, immediately after spinal anesthesia, 5 minutes, 15 minutes and 30 minutes after spinal anesthesia, and in recovery, there was no significant difference between median and paramedic groups in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. (05/0> P). In the periods before spinal anesthesia, immediately after spinal anesthesia and 5 minutes after spinal anesthesia, there was a significant difference in mean heart rate between Medin and Paramedin groups (P <0. 05). On the first and fourth days, the incidence of PDPH was higher in the paramedin group than in the medin group. But the results of statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of PDPH at different times (p <0. 05). Conclusion: Although different benefits have been mentioned for each of Madin and Paramedin methods, but in relation to the incidence of headache, in this study, no significant difference was reported between Madin and Paramedin groups. Therefore, with more studies and more studies related to patient satisfaction, the best method can be used in choosing intrathecal anesthesia technique.