On this article, one of the most significant disturbances of social theory, namely the relation between individual values and collective choice in the process of structural adjustment has been examined. At first, the philosophical basis of the structural adjustment, which is just individualism, has been scrutinized and in the framework of methodology, the great and basic inaudibilities of assumptions scope and claims of classic and neo-classic viewpoint have been manifested. Then, on the experimental fields it has been shown that non-market factors which pay no attention to "Individual" and "Personal Interest" have a decisive role on the fate of developed countries.It has also been shown that apart from the experiment of industrial countries, with all points existed in the various areas of this experiment, guides of neo-classic and monetarism that have been organized in the structural adjustment program of these countries, due to "change of conditions", enjoy weak possibility for undeveloped countries.