THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL
Year:2021 | Volume:85 | Issue:113|Papers Count:18

There is a time allowed for appealing against the arbitrator award (20 days or two months as the case maybe). If this deadline did not respect, the court would issue an order rejecting the petitioner that as specified (As stated) in Article 492 Code of Civil Procedure is certain. Therefore, there is no way for the plaintiffs to challenge the court order! This result, in some cases, is clearly unfair and causes the loss of rights. Thus, a path should be opened for its logical interpretation. As regard that sometimes are seen some obvious mistakes in Arbitrator’ s award and Sometimes the first courts make a mistake in calculation of term and deadline of the protest and also in the other words There should be a way to control the decisions of arbitrator, and the court, and the current state of Article 492 of the mentioned law certainly has irrational and unjust consequences. Attentively, the principles of arbitration and the rules related to legal deadlines, consequently the present article tries to show the main purpose of the legislature and the scope of the mentioned article with a view to judicial decisions. It should be said that despite the appearance of this article, its application is not referable.

Governments have recently incorporated foreign investment treaties into a so-called “ Non-Precluded Measure Clause ", which permits action contrary to the provisions of the treaty in cases where the protection of essential interests is necessary. In this descriptive-analytical method, this article outlines the most important challenges and explains the ways to eliminate or reduce them. The most important findings of the study indicate that the government's authority in practice was not absolute, but observable. The host government must impartially resort to this clause and is always obliged to respect the good faith towards another party. Despite the disagreement expressed in the liability of the host States, the dominant approach of dispute settlement tribunals is to compensate the investor in proportion to the loss incurred by him. Governments have recently incorporated foreign investment treaties into a so-called “ Non-Precluded Measure Clause ", which permits action contrary to the provisions of the treaty in cases where the protection of essential interests is necessary.

According to enactment No. 435 of the Supreme National Security Council, the Human Rights Headquarters has been established since 2005 under the structure of the Judiciary and exercises its competence in the field of human rights. This research in a descriptive-analytical format has studied and explained the status and competencies of this headquarters in the political and legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran and has identified and analyzed the challenges of this headquarters. Based on the findings of this study, the Human Rights Headquarters can only be identified as a sub-council under the Supreme National Security Council, which therefore, unlike the structure of this headquarters, which is under the judiciary, this headquarters has a multi-faceted status. Of course, the non-approval of the job description of this headquarters by the parliament is one of the most important challenges facing this headquarters, which due to its contradiction with the explicitness of Article 176 of the Constitution, has compromised the compliance of its decisions with legal standards. Therefore, it is necessary for the parliament to determine the competencies of this headquarters.

Currently, the change of agricultural lands is one of the important challenges of Iran's agricultural sector. Land use change annually removes a large part of agricultural land from the production cycle. The legislature has not yet adopted a consistent approach to deal with this crime, so that the 70s can be considered a period of deliberation and drawing, the 80s a period of change and regulation, and the 90s a period of weakening and destroying penal policy to preserve agricultural land use. And he knew the gardens. Land use change analysis and examining the strengths and weaknesses of legislation, along with paying attention to the proper judicial procedure, can reveal the existing challenges and gaps. In this article, I will analyze the elements of this offense and the possible interpretations of exceptions to land use change in an analytical manner. Then, according to the changes in the Islamic Penal Code adopted in 1392 in grading crimes and setting deadlines, we will answer the question of whether this action is considered a punishment or not by scrutinizing the nature of "tin and repression". According to the selected basis and subject, the writing method of this research is descriptive-analytical and library data has been used in data collection.

Currently members transplantation is one of the important ways to treat diseases. According to basic beliefs, The body is only a respectable collection of mysterious nature, But with scientific advances, Human comprehended the importance of the body and its members for use in medical research and medical applications. Hence the identification of the right of possession for man, In order to prevent the body from being wasted, The main motivation of the theorists In the field of studies, it is about the relationship between man and his body. But talk about human ownership on his body, It has always been associated with ethical, religious and cultural challenges. From this point of view, Theories such as” labur Theory” , Has been raised in Western law. Along with the theory body for body, whith aim of solving problems and compensate the lack of labur theory would be render for the first time. according to body for body theory, Use of the human body, is an essential component of research in the field of health. And this necessity is completely new and the lack of a historical record of the acquisition of man in his body, Cannot ignore such right. Because the basis of human knowledge changes over generation. So there is no infinite logic and what did not need yesterday, Can be needed today. Research methodology this research in terms of purpose is functional and in terms of type is qualitative and in terms of how to collect is librarian, and is based on on-line sourses.

Causation is one of the most significant topics of law, if not the most important one. This article analyzes the validity of expert opinion in determining establishment of causation and peripheral issues of causation. Iranian courts routinely delegate the recognition of causation establishment to governmental experts, regardless of whether there is any legal basis justifying such reference. This article answers the following inquiry: “ According to Iranian law, in what cases, if any, courts can rely on expert opinion in determining whether Causation is established for purpose of imposing liability? ” This article assumes that a criterion should be implemented/designed to recognize establishment of causation based on a customary standard. Although in certain cases, establishment of causation and in some peripheral issues related to the causation, namely recognition of material causes and amount of damages (in the cases of shared liability), expert opinion could be the sole basis for determinate establishment of causation.

According to codes of procedure (articles 348 and 371 Civil Procedure Code and article 477 Criminal Procedure Code) "Contrary to Islamic Jurisprudence" has been announced as the cause of quash of judgments. It is an important point and should be studied if this cause is applicable to all judgments or just judgments which rendered by virtue of religious sources and injunctions and according to principal 167 Constitutional law and article 3 Civil Procedure Code. Applying this cause in the manner that causes quash of judgments which rendered according to laws, it bring about the violation of the laws and this result is not coordinated with constitution law and legal system and arises the shaking of laws and disorder of legal system. Then, for solving this fundamental problem, we are obliged to know this cause as dissuaded from cases which its applying causes the quash of judgments which rendered according to laws.

Law on reducing the punishment of Taziri imprisonment was enacted in May 12, 2020. This law has made important amendments to the body of Iranian criminal law. It could be addressed in two aspects: theoretical and practical. The second one-legislator's mean to reducing the criminal population-should be considered in a result-based process after a reasonable period of time from its implementation. In theoretical view however these reforms can be the basis of more fundamental researches. The study of the recent enacted law shows an important change of criminal concepts that we call it Privatization of Criminal Law. Examples of this flow can be enumerated as follows: first, increasing the number of forgivable crimes. Second, The obvious effect of complainant's action on the nature of crimes. Third The possible effect of the complainant's action on the disappearing of the legal element of the crime. Fifth, complainant's role in determining the jurisdiction and limits of the authority of the reviewing authority. In this study, using the analytical method, the change in the attitude of the criminal legislator has been investigated. The findings of the study prove that the boundaries of criminal law are eroded and the concept of complainant is closer to the plaintiff and consequently the complaint to the petition, which occurred as a result of changing the legislator's position to the victim's place in criminal law.

for the first time, , The ability of activities stopping that Containing criminal activity and Harmful to the public interest, in all matters of production, service, and trade, through the use of preventive measures, Came off in Article 114 of Criminal Procedure Code adopted 1392. Measures with this approach have previously been taken only on a case-by-case basis in scattered laws and regulations, until a more serious look was taken with the passage of the aforementioned article. Despite this positive action, some challenges have led to a lack of full utilization of its capabilities and capabilities. The purpose of this paper is to design a conceptual model of the existing challenges and pathologies of Article 114 of the Criminal procedure code. The approach of this research is qualitative-exploratory. The paper concludes that there are fundamental challenges in the three categories of legislative, judicial, and executive. In the legislative category, the sub-categories of Deficiencies in the principles of a fair trial (Includes Measures nature ambiguity, lack of effective judicial Supervision, the uncertainty of the scope of the measures, Non-assignment of periodic reviews), ambiguous basic concepts, the lack of basic characteristics in dangerous attainment. In the judiciary category, the sub-categories of maximum-minimum perceptions, the conflict of rights and freedoms of activities with the public interest; , and In the Executive category, the sub-categories of the lack of necessary mechanisms; The unpredictability of effective implementation strategies and economic consequences can be examined. The conceptual model of the pathology of Article 114 of Criminal procedure code is also designed and presented on this basis.

Bring an action is with the petitioner, therefore determining the title of action is dependent on the decision of plaintiff. The legislator has not, except in exceptional cases, chosen the mandatory titles for civil actions and has assigned the choice of title of action to the plaintiff due to the unlimited examples of civil actions and because of the base and nature of action. Therefore, the prosecutors are required to recognize the decision of the plaintiff to name their action. However, the title of the plaintiff is different from the one that is common for action or the legislator has used. In fact, the principle is on the authority of plaintiff to determine the title of a civil action unless the legislator itself specifies the elements and the title of the action, in which case the elective title of the legislator is mandatory. The principle of mastery of parties on the thematic directions of action and the principle of hearing action confirms the authority of plaintiff in determining civil action. In this article, the existence of this principle in the civil proceedings is investigated and confirmed.

Problem-Solving Courts with a specialized and independent structure were established in some countries with common law legal system to use the authority of courts to address the underlying problems of offenders and victims, the structural problems of the justice system, and the social problems of communities and finally to reduce the recidivism rate. However, because they reach only a small proportion of litigants compared to the traditional courts, the idea of applying core principles of problem-solving courts to traditional courts was put forward. This article, with a qualitative method, first examines the necessity of problem-solving approach in judicial system and then analyses the opportunities and barriers to applying problem-solving principles and practices in traditional criminal courts of Iran. The findings of the research show that some principles like changing traditional attitudes and role orientations of judges, prosecutors, attorneys, and other justice system actors is the basis for adopting problem-solving approach in traditional criminal courts of Iran and it can hardly be transferred, but enhancing the direct interaction between judges and litigants is the most easiest. Moreover, resource constraints (lack of time, money, and staff) and educational and electronic systems limitations pose serious barriers in implementation of other principles and effectiveness of problem-solving approach. Tangible results show that the application of these principles and indicators can help increase the quality and effectiveness of the criminal justice procedure and reduce its non-therapeutic consequences.

The present paper seeks to examine the concept of currency in the Iranian legal system and to explain its conceptual relation to what is today known as cryptocurrency or virtual currency. Understanding this conceptual ratio will be important because if the concept of currency is to be applied to cryptocurrencies, cryptocurrency transactions will also be subject to legal provisions relating to unauthorized currency transactions, such as prohibition of trading without authorization from the central bank. This paper has analyzed analytically and using library resources that none of the elements of the Iranian legislature's definition of currency include "being money", "being common" and "being foreign". Does not conform to cryptocurrencies. The conceptual relationship of the two is legally a divisive one; Therefore, in the current situation, transfers of what is known as cryptocurrencies will not be subject to currency transfer laws and prohibitions. The freedom of cryptocurrency trading and the prohibition of partial currency trading are undermined by the economic unity of the two.

parent company often set up subsidiaries because of the variety of investments, the use of skilled and efficient managers, and the cost savings. In the corporate business group, the parent company may, by resorting to the principle of " Independence of the legal personality of the company ", escape from liability by exploiting the coverage of the legal personality of the subsidiary for its fraudulent purposes. Therefore, it is important to explain the responsibility of the parent company as an exception to the principle of the independence of the legal personality and to identify possible ways of abusing it. The mother company can exploit the subsidiary's legal personality coverage for such purposes as escape from religion, tax evasion, and unfair trading practices such as monopoly competition. Based on this assumption and in the vacuum of special regulations, based on the activity and potential misuse of the group of companies in Iranian law, one can, according to the existing jurisprudential and legal rules, including the rule of " qui sentit commomum sentire debet et onus; he who gains the advantages also must suffer the burden" The, " deceive” , “ liability for ownership or control” , "vicarious liability" and " causing " were responsible for the parent's liability for damages to third parties. In order to prevent potential abusive uses, it is imperative to develop mandatory screening laws, reform of the laws and the tax system, and the establishment of regulatory mechanisms in the corporate group.

Legal principles is one of the sources of law. Legal system need to principles so need rules to direct subjects and behaviors. But role of principle is not limited to filling gaps. Legal principles importance in interpretation of laws, specially conflict Laws. In common view, the Function of principles, is Unknown. So, lawyers only talk about rules of Reconciling laws: new law Abrogate prior law between two conflicting laws. Also, General Law usually derogate special one. Albeit, preferring a special law against general one has not presume rule; altogether general law might be closer to legal principles. So only by reasoning in any case we can say one Special law derogate general law tacitly or anterior law abrogate Posterior law. Because these rules of reconciling between conflicts laws, such as other rules of interpretation, aren’ t decisive. Perhaps Ancient Law be concordant whit reasonable Factors so better than new one. Especially in respect of tow conflict section of one statute we cannot say Legislator has repealed one of them by another one. So the significant of legal principles clear to everyone. Only by reasoning in any case we can say one Special law derogate general law or general law abrogate Special one impliedly. Because these rules of Reconciling between conflicts laws, such as other rules of interpretation, aren’ t decisive. so they may be justified by legal reasoning and legal principles.

Most of judgements of the administrative court of justice in relation to the title of " garden" have been issued about the identifying a competent authority for its recognition. In this regard, after the enactment of the law on the reform of the law on the conservation and development of greenbelt in cities in 2009 and the formation of the "Article 7 commission", the court's inappropriate procedure in identifying the "article 12 commission of the land-urban law" as a competent authority for recognition the garden was refurbished. In contrast, and because of misinterpretations of the governing laws, one of the issues that have overlooked by the judges was the attention to characteristics of the "garden" and its nature. The present text deals with the court's different and sometimes divergent procedures on the above issues. Also, the nature of article 7 commission and its decisions to identify the competent authority to overseeing them, as well as the decision-making authority for changing the use of gardens, are other issues besides identifying the competent authority to identify the garden, that form the main concern of this article.

According to Article 149 of the Islamic Penal Code, “ Where at the time of committing a crime, there is a mental disorder in a way that the perpetrator lacked the volition and power of discernment, he will be deemed insane, and shall have no criminal responsibility” . This article is the last will of the legislator on insanity. In total there are three criteria for insanity: Cognitive and Volition Criterion, customary criterion and companion and Contradiction Criterion. In the cognitive criteria, the main emphasis is on the the nature of the action. Volition criterion relying on individual control over their behavior. In the customary standard, since insanity is a customary concept, it is referred to the custom to diagnosis it. The psychiatric criterion can be analyzed in the context of a specific custom. In the companion criterion, the main emphasis is in relationship with insane person. At paradoxical level, attention is paid to behaviors that are not matched with mental health. The most appropriate solution for detecting insanity is attention to perception and failure of perception based on symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations.