مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,338
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR RANKING WATER TRANSFER PROJECTS

Pages

  1-12

Abstract

 Water resources are among basics for sustainable development. The non uniform temporal and spatial distribution of water resources is led to shortage water in arid and semi arid regions. The inter basin water transfer projects are one remedy to this problem. According to the diversity of the feasible water transfer projects, RANKING of the projects with different criteria is currently one of the important issues in water resources management. FUZZY Multiple Criteria Decision Making (FMADM) is a collection of methodologies which can be used to compare, select, or rank multiple alternatives that typically involve incommensurate attributes. The aim of this research was to use some of the FUZZY multiple attribute group decision making methods for RANKING some INTER-BASIN WATER TRANSFER PROJECTS of Karoon River, western Iran. Maximizing and minimizing sets method, the Bonissone’s method for group decision making, FUZZY TOPSIS for group decision making, and FUZZY Decision Making software were used in this study. A set of 10 interbasin water transfer projects with 8 criteria were considered. First, the weight of each criterion was determined within a group of five water resources experts, Then the rating preference for each alternative were obtained by the same group of experts. Finally, the results of different methods were compared. The results showed that the Tunnel Koohrang 1 posses the higher rank. Also, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was obtained between different methods. The results showed that the FUZZY TOPSIS and Bonissone method provide the best correlation. For evaluating the criteria weightings, the sensitivity analysis was conducted and the results were compared.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAZAVI TOUSI, S.L., SAMANI, J.M.V., & KOUREHPAZAN DEZFOULI, A.. (2011). COMPARISON OF FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR RANKING WATER TRANSFER PROJECTS. IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 7(3 (21)), 1-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/100041/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAZAVI TOUSI S.L., SAMANI J.M.V., KOUREHPAZAN DEZFOULI A.. COMPARISON OF FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR RANKING WATER TRANSFER PROJECTS. IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH[Internet]. 2011;7(3 (21)):1-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/100041/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S.L. RAZAVI TOUSI, J.M.V. SAMANI, and A. KOUREHPAZAN DEZFOULI, “COMPARISON OF FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR RANKING WATER TRANSFER PROJECTS,” IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, vol. 7, no. 3 (21), pp. 1–12, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/100041/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button