EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR MODIFYING URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM USING RISK-BASED CRITERIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOLEYMANI M.; BEHZADIAN K.; ARDESHIR A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: WATER AND WASTEWATER Year:2015 | Volume:26 | Issue:6 (100) Page(s): 16-29

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

914

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR MODIFYING URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM USING RISK-BASED CRITERIA

Author(s)

SOLEYMANI M. | BEHZADIAN K. | ARDESHIR A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RISK ASSESSMENTQ2

URBAN FLOODQ2

RUNOFF POLLUTION SOURCESQ2

MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKINGQ1

SWMMQ1

Abstract

Appropriate modification of existing urban storm water drainage networks may help reduce network inundation and flood-borne pollution risks. It will, therefore, be necessary to analyze the risks associated with water quantity and quality during URBAN FLOODing before any reconstruction strategies can be identified that are adaptable to, or compatible with, urban sustainable development strategies. In this paper, three network modification strategies are evaluated against the three criteria of network inundation at different sections, flood pollution risks, and modification plan costs. The modification strategies evaluated include the conventional approach of increasing conduit dimensions as well as the two novels swale and bioretention systems. The strategies are then prioritised using a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. The application of the proposed methodology is illustrated in the case study of urban storm water drainage systems in the Golestan City in Tehran Province for which a hydrological and hydraulic simulation model has been developed using the SWMM software. The results show that the swale system is the best strategy with an approximate cost of 20 billion Rials (almost US$ 6 million). Compared to the existing system in operation, the proposed system will be capable of reducing 59% of the quantitative risk of flooding (inundation) and 26% of the water quality risk (pollution loads).

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SOLEYMANI, M., BEHZADIAN, K., & ARDESHIR, A.. (2015). EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR MODIFYING URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM USING RISK-BASED CRITERIA. WATER AND WASTEWATER, 26(6 (100)), 16-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/103912/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOLEYMANI M., BEHZADIAN K., ARDESHIR A.. EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR MODIFYING URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM USING RISK-BASED CRITERIA. WATER AND WASTEWATER[Internet]. 2015;26(6 (100)):16-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/103912/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SOLEYMANI, K. BEHZADIAN, and A. ARDESHIR, “EVALUATION OF STRATEGIES FOR MODIFYING URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM USING RISK-BASED CRITERIA,” WATER AND WASTEWATER, vol. 26, no. 6 (100), pp. 16–29, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/103912/en

Related Journal Papers