مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

738
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS IN PREPARING OF LAND USE LAYER USING ETM+ DATA (CASE STUDY: KAMEH WATERSHED)

Pages

  27-38

Abstract

 Land cover information can be used in hydrologic modeling to estimate the value of SURFACE ROUGHNESS or friction. The objective of this work is comparison of two different methods to provide LAND COVER maps using Landsat images to estimate SURFACE ROUGHNESS in the manning equation and curve number (CN) in SCS method in the Kameh watershed located in the North of Torbat Heydarieh. At the first, Radiometric and Geometric correction performed on ETM+ data. Then with field surveying, the LAND COVER classes were defined and training areas were selected. All of the bands with the exception of band 6 were used in classification. Because of low accuracy of village and road classes, these classes were removed fromclassification process and for entering these classes in the final map, information from the other layers of GIS system were applied. Results of this work show that in the FUZZY method using 3 layers in classification, the overall accuracy is 75.12% and kappa Index is 0.63.While those of FUZZY method using 2 layers in classification and MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD method are (73.3%, 0.6) and (72.39%, 0.59) respectively. Therefore the FUZZY method using 3 layers in classification is recommended.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    AKBARPOUR, ABOU ALFAZL, SHARIFI, M.B., & MEMARIAN KHALILABAD, H.. (2006). THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS IN PREPARING OF LAND USE LAYER USING ETM+ DATA (CASE STUDY: KAMEH WATERSHED). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RANGE AND DESERT RESEARCH, 13(1 (22)), 27-38. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106999/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AKBARPOUR ABOU ALFAZL, SHARIFI M.B., MEMARIAN KHALILABAD H.. THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS IN PREPARING OF LAND USE LAYER USING ETM+ DATA (CASE STUDY: KAMEH WATERSHED). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RANGE AND DESERT RESEARCH[Internet]. 2006;13(1 (22)):27-38. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106999/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABOU ALFAZL AKBARPOUR, M.B. SHARIFI, and H. MEMARIAN KHALILABAD, “THE COMPARISON OF FUZZY AND MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS IN PREPARING OF LAND USE LAYER USING ETM+ DATA (CASE STUDY: KAMEH WATERSHED),” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RANGE AND DESERT RESEARCH, vol. 13, no. 1 (22), pp. 27–38, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106999/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button