A Study on the Precedent of Judicial Service (Communication at the Last Domicile) in the Light of Unifying Decision No. 23/1981 of the Supreme Court

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Heidari Siroos

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS JOURNAL Year:2023 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 Page(s): 582-601

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Study on the Precedent of Judicial Service (Communication at the Last Domicile) in the Light of Unifying Decision No. 23/1981 of the Supreme Court

Author(s)

Heidari Siroos | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Service of Judicial DocumentsQ4

Electronic ServiceQ4

Traditional ServiceQ4

Precedent of Judicial Service.Communication at the Last DomicileQ4

Abstract

Since a long time, one of the mandatory contents of the petition, whether it is a preliminary or a complaint against the decision, has been the inclusion of the residence and the exact address of the litigants, and such a requirement has been provided in order to facilitate the Service of Judicial Documents. It is reasonable to expect the litigants or their lawyers and representatives to notify the court of the change in their address, and as long as the aforementioned order is not followed, the litigants will be served in the same place as before. The question that has been raised and disputed in the judicial procedure is whether the precedent of service in the first instance may be extended to the stage of appeal against the decision or not? Unifying decision No. 23/1981 of the General Board of the Supreme Court, in response to the question raised, determined the independence of each of the stages of the proceedings in terms of the precedent service and did not consider the precedent of service in the first instance to be applicable in the appeal stage. This article has been written as a criticism of the said decision and the proposal of opposing thoughts, as well as reconciling the issue with the regulations related to electronic judicial service.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops