مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

44
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

8
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Application of Acoustic Tomographic Data in Short-Term Forecasting of Streamflow Using Combinatorial GMDH Algorithm (CGA)

Pages

  1755-1772

Abstract

 Short-term forecasting of streamflow is one of the most important goals in water resources management and flood control. However, one of the problems that researchers always face in this type of prediction is the Lack of an accurate and high-resolution database. The Fluvial Acoustic Tomography (FAT) is an innovative technology that acquires streamflow data. Therefore, by using the data collected from this technology with a suitable forecast model, accurate short-term Streamflow Forecasting can be achieved. In this research, the effect of FAT data on short-term Streamflow Forecasting by the Combinatorial GMDH Algorithm (CGA) has been investigated and compared with one obtained from the Rating Curve method. The k-fold cross-validation criterion has been used to prevent over-fitting. The results showed that the FAT data increases the accuracy of short-term forecasting. As an example, the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (ENS) for the 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours forecast horizons were 0.98, 0.96, 0.94, 0.88, 0.73, and 0.54, respectively. While these values for the Rating Curve ones were 0.97, 0.84, 0.61, 0.27, 0.12, and 0.11, respectively.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button