مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

مقاله مقاله نشریه

مشخصات مقاله

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

بازدید:

42
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

دانلود:

18
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

استناد:

اطلاعات مقاله نشریه

عنوان

Popper’s Sociology of Science and Its Political Deficit

نویسندگان

 Jarvie Ian | صدور گواهی نویسنده 

صفحات

 صفحه شروع 168 | صفحه پایان 187

چکیده

 The paper offers a distinctive reading of Popper’s work, suggesting that his Logic of Scientific Discovery (LScD) might be re-interpreted in the light of his open society. Indeed, Popper can be interpreted as criticising certain aspects of his first book, and as a result improving upon them, in his second. It suggests translating what Popper says about ‘conventions’ into his later vocabulary of ‘social institutions’. Looking back, I believe that Popper never intended the language of conventions and decisions to be read individualistically. I remain unsure whether Popper was himself quite as clear about this as he could have been.  My reading makes Popper a pioneer in the sociology of science. Scientific institutions are arenas of political power; but Popper did not discuss the structure and inter-relations of the social institutions of science, or offer a politics of science in the context of his methodology. What is missing from the skeletal sociology of LScD is the politics. We could put it in Popperian terms this way: scientific institutions are both open and closed. They are closed, firmly, to the inexpert, to the non-members; supposedly they are open to the qualified, provided the prerogatives of seniority and leadership are acknowledged. Despite these shortcomings, Popper’s critical and rational approach and his insistence on openness and intellectual honesty are still important today.

استنادها

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • ارجاعات

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • استناددهی

    مقالات مرتبط نشریه ای

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • مقالات مرتبط همایشی

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • طرح های مرتبط

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • کارگاه های پیشنهادی






    بازگشت به بالا
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button