مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

مقاله مقاله نشریه

مشخصات مقاله

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

نسخه انگلیسی

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

بازدید:

36
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

دانلود:

12
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

استناد:

اطلاعات مقاله نشریه

عنوان

Fichte’s Role in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapter 4

نویسندگان

 Redding Paul | صدور گواهی نویسنده 

صفحات

 صفحه شروع 11 | صفحه پایان 28

چکیده

 In this paper I return to the familiar territory of the Lord-Bondsman "dialectic" in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit in order to raise the question of the relation of Hegel's use of the theme of Recognition there to Fichte's. Fichte had introduced the notion of Recognition in his Foundations of Natural Right, to "deduce" the social existence of humans within relations of mutual Recognition as a necessary condition of their very Self-consciousness. However, there it also functioned as part of a solution to a problem within the work on which the theory of rights was meant to be based, the earlier Foundation of the Complete Wissenschaftslehre of 1794-5. In Hegel's classic account in chapter 4 of the Phenomenology we find Recognition offered as a solution to a problem within an account of "self-consciousness" that has a number of clearly Fichtean features. But I suggest that to the degree that the lord-bondsman episode there expresses any "theory of Recognition", it is not Hegel’s own theory but rather his interpretation of Fichte's, a theory of which he is critical. Freed from this misleading assumption that the "lord-bondsman dialectic" represents something deep about Hegel's own philosophy, we might then be more able to get clearer about Hegel's actual views about Recognition and the role it plays in his own philosophy.

استنادها

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • ارجاعات

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • استناددهی

    مقالات مرتبط نشریه ای

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • مقالات مرتبط همایشی

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • طرح های مرتبط

  • ثبت نشده است.

    • کارگاه های پیشنهادی






    بازگشت به بالا
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button