EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RICE HARVESTING METHODS IN GILAN PROVINCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASAN JANI H.; HOSSEINI MARYAM; KHADEM ALHOSSEINI N.A.; ALIZADEH M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE Year:2007 | Volume:9 | Issue:1 Page(s): 23-38

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,328

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RICE HARVESTING METHODS IN GILAN PROVINCE

Author(s)

HASAN JANI H. | HOSSEINI MARYAM | KHADEM ALHOSSEINI N.A. | ALIZADEH M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMBINEQ3

COSTSQ3

HARVESTERQ3

HARVESTING LOSSESQ2

RICE HARVESTINGQ3

Abstract

Rice is one of the most important staple cereals in Iran and has a main role in providing the food security. Harvesting by hand postpone the RICE HARVESTING stage, and facing late season rainfall, an increase of yield losses during harvesting. To determine the most suitable harvesting method in Gilan, three different harvesting methods (by hand, HARVESTER and COMBINE) were considered as treatments and four different cities as blocks. The effective farm capacity, percent of total losses, percent of HARVESTING LOSSES, number of workers and harvest COSTS were determined. The difference of percent of total losses and other factors were significant in different harvesting methods. Effective farm capacity in harvesting with HARVESTER was more than other methods. Harvesting by COMBINE had the lowest losses percent (1.92%). In harvesting by hand 98.3 percent of harvesting COSTS were related to harvesting and collecting of crops. In lands that have been consolidated, using COMBINE and in small scale the use of HARVESTER are recommended.

Cites

No record.

References

EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF RICE LOSSES IN VARIOUS HARVESTING METHODS

Cite

APA: Copy

HASAN JANI, H., HOSSEINI, MARYAM, KHADEM ALHOSSEINI, N.A., & ALIZADEH, M.R.. (2007). EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RICE HARVESTING METHODS IN GILAN PROVINCE. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, 9(1), 23-38. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123840/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASAN JANI H., HOSSEINI MARYAM, KHADEM ALHOSSEINI N.A., ALIZADEH M.R.. EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RICE HARVESTING METHODS IN GILAN PROVINCE. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE[Internet]. 2007;9(1):23-38. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123840/en

IEEE: Copy

H. HASAN JANI, MARYAM HOSSEINI, N.A. KHADEM ALHOSSEINI, and M.R. ALIZADEH, “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT RICE HARVESTING METHODS IN GILAN PROVINCE,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–38, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123840/en

Related Journal Papers