COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF GUELPH PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS TO CALCULATE FIELD HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SILTY-LOAM SOIL ABOVE WATER SURFACE TABLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHOBADIAN R.; MOHAMMADI KAMRAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Water and Soil Year:2010 | Volume:24 | Issue:3 Page(s): 501-511

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,811

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF GUELPH PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS TO CALCULATE FIELD HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SILTY-LOAM SOIL ABOVE WATER SURFACE TABLE

Author(s)

GHOBADIAN R. | MOHAMMADI KAMRAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITYQ2

GUELPH PERMEAMETERQ3

Abstract

Information on spatial and temporal variations of soil HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (k) is essential to improve soil and water management. However several techniques have been proposed for measuring of soil HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY above water surface table, but reliability and easy use of these methods in various conditions were always concern for engineers. The purposes of this study are measuring of the soli HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY by GUELPH PERMEAMETER as a reliable method and determination of the best single-depth analysis method equivalent to two- depth method. To achieve this goal, 40 boreholes with depth of 60 cm were drilled in a grid of 5×5 m in the research farm of agricultural faculty, Razi University, Kermanshah. Soil texture of the study area is siltyloam.After identification tests such as soil gradation, determination of the soil liquid and plasticity limits and determination of the specific gravity, soil saturated HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY (K¦s) and matric potential (Æm) m φ were measured by GUELPH PERMEAMETER for three fixed ponding depths 5, 15 and 25 cm. Because of heterogeneous of equations in three-depth method only 17 success well obtained while in two-depth method for two ponding depths 5 and 15 cm, 26 successful well obtained. Data of these 26 boreholes were used for statistical analysis.The results of statistical analysis showed that: 1) Mean of soil HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY in the study area is 1.552×10-6 (m/s), 2) Among the single depth methods, Richards regression basic analysis with values of 0.205 and 0.994 for b and w respectively is the nearest method to tow-depth method, 3) There is a significant difference at 5% level between the results from two-depths analysis of GUELPH PERMEAMETER with Richards and Laplace single-depth methods, 4) Average values of Æm and a∗ in the study area were calculated 0.841×10-6 (m2/s) and 2.127(1/s) respectively, and 5) Values of Æm have less variation coefficients and standard deviation than values of sorptive number (a∗).

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHOBADIAN, R., & MOHAMMADI, KAMRAN. (2010). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF GUELPH PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS TO CALCULATE FIELD HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SILTY-LOAM SOIL ABOVE WATER SURFACE TABLE. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), 24(3), 501-511. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/141513/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHOBADIAN R., MOHAMMADI KAMRAN. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF GUELPH PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS TO CALCULATE FIELD HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SILTY-LOAM SOIL ABOVE WATER SURFACE TABLE. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY)[Internet]. 2010;24(3):501-511. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/141513/en

IEEE: Copy

R. GHOBADIAN, and KAMRAN MOHAMMADI, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF GUELPH PERMEAMETER ANALYSIS TO CALCULATE FIELD HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF SILTY-LOAM SOIL ABOVE WATER SURFACE TABLE,” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 501–511, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/141513/en

Related Journal Papers