مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

758
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SERVICES QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODELS BETWEEN STUDENTS FROM TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS QUALITY BY USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK

Pages

  663-672

Abstract

 The aim of this study is quantity determining and evaluating of the quality position of teaching and learning process. So, the ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS were used for modeling nonlinear relationships to inspect and evaluate different models of service quality evaluation. The statistical population include 1070 peoples, which were master and PhD students of Faculty of Agriculture of Ferdowsi University (Mashhad). 280 questionnaires were collected by using Morgan table; from which 202 questionnaires were finally analyzed. In order to inspect and evaluate the QUALITY OF TEACHING and learning process, four models were used with ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, including non-weighted Servprof, non-weighted Servqual, weighted Servprof and weighted Servqual. The results of the artificial neural network method showed that WEIGHTED SERVQUAL MODEL is more accurate to evaluate the QUALITY OF TEACHING and to predict satisfactory. 7-29-14-1 architecture with 29 and 14 neurons respectively in the first and second hidden layers and one neuron (weighted Servqual) in the output layer was chosen as the best model for determining the quality evaluation. This architecture has the best results for R (0.96), MAE (0.18), MSE (0.06) and MAPE (4.41%) between the actual and modeled values.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HEJAZI, SEYED YOUSEF, RAJABIAN GHARIB, FATEMEH, & OMID, MAHMOOD. (2015). COMPARISON OF SERVICES QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODELS BETWEEN STUDENTS FROM TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS QUALITY BY USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICUTURAL ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 45(4), 663-672. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/146384/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HEJAZI SEYED YOUSEF, RAJABIAN GHARIB FATEMEH, OMID MAHMOOD. COMPARISON OF SERVICES QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODELS BETWEEN STUDENTS FROM TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS QUALITY BY USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICUTURAL ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH[Internet]. 2015;45(4):663-672. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/146384/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYED YOUSEF HEJAZI, FATEMEH RAJABIAN GHARIB, and MAHMOOD OMID, “COMPARISON OF SERVICES QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODELS BETWEEN STUDENTS FROM TEACHING AND LEARNING PROCESS QUALITY BY USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICUTURAL ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 663–672, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/146384/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top