Explanation and Comparison of Disinterestedness Aspects in Aesthetic Experience in the View of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shakorisani Masoumeh; AFARIN FARIDEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HONAR-HA-YE-TAJASSOMI (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA ) Year:2019 | Volume:24 | Issue:3 Page(s): 5-16

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

849

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Explanation and Comparison of Disinterestedness Aspects in Aesthetic Experience in the View of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche

Author(s)

Shakorisani Masoumeh | AFARIN FARIDEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DisinterestednessQ2

BeautyQ1

Aesthetic ExperienceQ1

German AestheticsQ1

Abstract

Disinterestedness is one of the main concepts in the aesthetics of the eighteenth century in Britain and Germany. In this research, the whatness of necessary and sufficient conditions for different aspects of this concept in its German branch is investigated. The purpose of recognizing different aspects of the concept of Disinterestedness is to make a distinction between the Aesthetic Experience of others like empiric, epistemic, moral, and physical ones. The Aesthetic Experience seems to be different from the cognitive one, Such an idea is supported by Kant's view. Can it (autonomous Aesthetic Experience) be a continuous view in the thinking of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche? This study, with the comparative-analytic method, concludes that Disinterestedness can be divided into theoretical, practical, and sensational divisions, and Kant, in the three divisions, provided the fundamental context for others. Theoretical Disinterestedness in Kant is related to the concept of understanding, the cause and effect relation in the world and its teleological mechanism, the purposiveness of the form of the object. in the practical part, towards the teleological practice, in rapport to the morality and the good, in sensational part the personal intentions desires, purposes & interests toward objective determination lead to various aspects of Disinterestedness. Schopenhauer took on the concept of Disinterestedness from Kant and describes its aspects in his philosophical system, in a recent way different from Kant. The aesthetics of Schopenhauer lies in the heart of his metaphysics. He believed that the “ will” is the origin of the universe underlying ground of the world as representation. Schopenhauer took a delicate distance from Kant by emphasizing on subject of cognition with suspended Will, and also on the body. He distances from Kant by these accentuation. On the other hand, Schopenhauer's “ will” is similar to the Kant's “ thing-in-itself, but it is perceptible through Ideas which are mediation between the will and the tangible world. In order to understand ideas through ordinary objects, It should become a disinterested observer and ignore the individuality and personal will. it should be independent of any forms of space, time and causality through the suppression of the individual will. That means through the asceticism & aesthetic contemplation. Nietzsche challenged Kant's tenacious approach in the Birth of Tragedy with ignorance of objectivity and subjectivity. He relied on the two fundamental forces of nature, namely the Apollonian and the Dionysian which are active in art. With an accentuation on dionysian forces which is irreducible to two forces, Nietzsche believed that both qualities of two forces, in addition to Disinterestedness and desires will drive art. Nietzsche` s concentration On the Genealogy of Morality is on physiology & physiology of art that required, some concepts like bodily states, sensuality and sexuality in order to enhance the life. So, art is an affirmation and apprehension of life with an emphasis on Aesthetic Experience. As a result, it seemed that Kant's approach in the definition of Disinterestedness is stronge and radical. Schopenhauer's view is flexible and two-sided, and Nietzsche's approach especially in On the Genealogy of Morality is evaluated different or weak in comparison to Kant.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shakorisani, Masoumeh, & AFARIN, FARIDEH. (2019). Explanation and Comparison of Disinterestedness Aspects in Aesthetic Experience in the View of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. HONAR-HA-YE-TAJASSOMI (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA ), 24(3 ), 5-16. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/146745/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shakorisani Masoumeh, AFARIN FARIDEH. Explanation and Comparison of Disinterestedness Aspects in Aesthetic Experience in the View of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. HONAR-HA-YE-TAJASSOMI (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA )[Internet]. 2019;24(3 ):5-16. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/146745/en

IEEE: Copy

Masoumeh Shakorisani, and FARIDEH AFARIN, “Explanation and Comparison of Disinterestedness Aspects in Aesthetic Experience in the View of Kant, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche,” HONAR-HA-YE-TAJASSOMI (HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA ), vol. 24, no. 3 , pp. 5–16, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/146745/en

Related Journal Papers