مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

836
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING COMBINED ARMA-PARCH AND ARMA-ARCH MODELS FOR MODELING PEAK FLOW DISCHARGE (CASE STUDY: SIMINEHROOD RIVER IN THE WEST AZARBAIJAN PROVINCE)

Pages

  113-127

Abstract

 Accurate prediction of river flow discharge is very important for optimization and management of surface water resources. One of the applicable ways for simulating and predicting hydrological data such as river flow is using time series models. But one of the major problems for prediction of hydrological data by time series models is assignment of the generation approach of the random and stochastic series. In this study, it is attempted to define a systematic framework for generating random component of a time series model. In this case, after initial tests on the Siminehrood river PEAK FLOW DISCHARGE time series during 1967-2011, the ARMA models were evaluated and the ARMA (1,0) model was selected as the best model. Then residual series of the selected ARMA model was extracted and fitted by ARCH and PARCH NONLINEAR MODELS approaches to obtain the ARMA-PARCH and ARMA-ARCH models. Results showed that using combined ARMA-PARCH and ARMA-ARCH models reduced the error of models up to 92.22 and 92.16 percent, respectively. It was observed that between the two combined models, the ARMAPARCH model had more accuracy and less error than the ARMA-ARCH model. Also with the selected combined model, the maximum and minimum points of the PEAK FLOW DISCHARGEs were modeled well for the studied station.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAZERI TAHROUDI, M., & KHALILI, K.. (2015). COMPARING COMBINED ARMA-PARCH AND ARMA-ARCH MODELS FOR MODELING PEAK FLOW DISCHARGE (CASE STUDY: SIMINEHROOD RIVER IN THE WEST AZARBAIJAN PROVINCE). WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE), 25(4/1), 113-127. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/147882/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAZERI TAHROUDI M., KHALILI K.. COMPARING COMBINED ARMA-PARCH AND ARMA-ARCH MODELS FOR MODELING PEAK FLOW DISCHARGE (CASE STUDY: SIMINEHROOD RIVER IN THE WEST AZARBAIJAN PROVINCE). WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2015;25(4/1):113-127. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/147882/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. NAZERI TAHROUDI, and K. KHALILI, “COMPARING COMBINED ARMA-PARCH AND ARMA-ARCH MODELS FOR MODELING PEAK FLOW DISCHARGE (CASE STUDY: SIMINEHROOD RIVER IN THE WEST AZARBAIJAN PROVINCE),” WATER AND SOIL SCIENCE (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE), vol. 25, no. 4/1, pp. 113–127, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/147882/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button