A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OFFICE PARK AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOSHARZADEH MEHRABI Z.; SABRI SINA; SABRI SOHEYL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOVIATESHAHR Year:2010 | Volume:3 | Issue:5 Page(s): 111-122

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,148

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OFFICE PARK AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES

Author(s)

MOSHARZADEH MEHRABI Z. | SABRI SINA | SABRI SOHEYL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENTQ3

OFFICE PARKSQ3

SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONSQ3

PHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONSQ3

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONSQ3

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONSQ3

Abstract

The application of sustainability theory, as one of the new approaches, has enjoyed the spotlight among many of urban pioneers and scholars. This research intends to study the possibility of utilizing the sustainability theory in an executive framework and its direct application in urban plans. In this regard, the location allocation viewpoint of OFFICE PARKS, as one of significant executive policies in Iranian provincial authorities, is evaluated. The research method is divided in two stages. The first stage is comprised of a descriptive method in identifying the meanings and epistemology of sustainable development as well as office park approaches. Then in second stage the research introduces some indicators in both approaches and evaluates them using a comparative method. Four criteria of economic, environmental, physical, and SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS are compared in two approaches. Ultimately, the result reveals a satisfactory accordance in almost all of the criteria within the sustainability and office park viewpoints. The highest conformity is in ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS and the least is defined in physical features. Notwithstanding, there are some executive limitations that are highlighted in this research. It is believed that by removing of those barriers the optimum benefit can be achieved in the allocation of OFFICE PARKS.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MOSHARZADEH MEHRABI, Z., SABRI, SINA, & SABRI, SOHEYL. (2010). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OFFICE PARK AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES. HOVIATESHAHR, 3(5), 111-122. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/154653/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOSHARZADEH MEHRABI Z., SABRI SINA, SABRI SOHEYL. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OFFICE PARK AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES. HOVIATESHAHR[Internet]. 2010;3(5):111-122. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/154653/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. MOSHARZADEH MEHRABI, SINA SABRI, and SOHEYL SABRI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OFFICE PARK AND SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES,” HOVIATESHAHR, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 111–122, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/154653/en

Related Journal Papers