THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REINTERPRETATION AND REQUALIFICATION OF TRADITION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE OF IRAN AND EUROPE (CASE STUDY: WORKS OF MIRMIRAN AND CORBUSIER)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHBAZI MAJID; TORABI ZOHREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOVIATESHAHR Year:2014 | Volume:8 | Issue:19 Page(s): 35-48

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,496

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REINTERPRETATION AND REQUALIFICATION OF TRADITION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE OF IRAN AND EUROPE (CASE STUDY: WORKS OF MIRMIRAN AND CORBUSIER)

Author(s)

SHAHBAZI MAJID | TORABI ZOHREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TRADITIONQ2

MODERNISMQ2

CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTUREQ2

TYPOLOGYQ2

MODULAR SYSTEMQ2

TRANSPARENCYQ2

Abstract

In Architecture and Urban Planning theoretical discussion, because of the importance in “identity” and “TRADITION”, there have been major discussions by the experts. CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE has always been a concern for providing communication between the architectural past and present, both in theory and in practice. Therefore, in the whole point of view, two different important ideas would be appeared. Some of the architects believe studying on these two mentioned ideas in the age globalization can be a waste of time, they also believe that, architects have to forget the whole idea and they have to follow the current idea of Architecture, which is the Western Architecture (ideas, concepts, materials, …). But the point is here, for these groups of architects the only point about Architecture which is shinny for them from the whole ideas is the Styles and Types of Western Architecture.But the second group has the obvious and different idea, as an example. We can mention Dr. Etesam (in 1384). He believes, Japanese Architecture was based on its valuable principles and TRADITIONs in Japan’s ancient architecture, and they could get a great place in world’s Architecture by reinterpreting and making requalification in concepts.And also their creative architects could create some unique high-value works, without imitating the elements, or any other principles from their important works in Architecture, but is a follow of moral reinterpreting of their TRADITIONal Architecture. In comparison, perhaps we can say Mir Miran is like them in Iran. In most of his projects, there had been moral, abstract and conceptual aspects of reinterpreted elements and TRADITIONs of Iranian Architecture.But here, in this paper, Mir Miran’s point of view in reusing TRADITION would not be compared by Japanese architects, that will be compared with founder of modern Architecture Corbusier. The kinds of reinterpreting of cultural and local TRADITIONs by Mir Miran and Corbusier is completely different –as we mentioned in essay-Le Corbusier was reinterpreting elements in touchable manifestation and materialistic customs of western classic Architecture’s point of view by western materialistic aspects, like in: Dimension, measurement, proportions and also reinterpreting the relations between existence elements in building, like: steps, structure and so on, in the format of new thoughts.But Mir Miran was looking for moral and meaningful atmosphere to reinterpret customs and elements of Iranian architecture in more abstract and non- materialistic way. He was trying to reinterpret the concepts like: “inside and outside difference, TRANSPARENCY, and lightness of Iran’s CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE”.To show and compare Mir Miran’s and Le Corbusier’s point of view in reusing customs, compare villa Stain (designed by Corbusier), with villa Foss Kari (designed by Andrea Palladio, and then the Fat plan and Massia (designed by Le Corbusier), from the TYPOLOGY point of view. And then we will study and analyze Mir Miran’s point of view in reinterpreting and reusing customs and elements of Iranian Architecture in Frahangestan’s project, and also the hierarchy and proportion of the building in Iran’s embassies and consulates and 40 Soton palace in Isfahan.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHBAZI, MAJID, & TORABI, ZOHREH. (2014). THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REINTERPRETATION AND REQUALIFICATION OF TRADITION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE OF IRAN AND EUROPE (CASE STUDY: WORKS OF MIRMIRAN AND CORBUSIER). HOVIATESHAHR, 8(19), 35-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/154665/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHBAZI MAJID, TORABI ZOHREH. THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REINTERPRETATION AND REQUALIFICATION OF TRADITION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE OF IRAN AND EUROPE (CASE STUDY: WORKS OF MIRMIRAN AND CORBUSIER). HOVIATESHAHR[Internet]. 2014;8(19):35-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/154665/en

IEEE: Copy

MAJID SHAHBAZI, and ZOHREH TORABI, “THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REINTERPRETATION AND REQUALIFICATION OF TRADITION IN THE CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE OF IRAN AND EUROPE (CASE STUDY: WORKS OF MIRMIRAN AND CORBUSIER),” HOVIATESHAHR, vol. 8, no. 19, pp. 35–48, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/154665/en

Related Journal Papers