مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

572
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF BASE FLOW SEPARATION METHODS FROM DAILY FLOW HYDROGRAPH (CASE STUDY: UPSTREAM OF BOOSTAN DAM CATCHMENT IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE)

Pages

  127-145

Abstract

BASE FLOW is a part of flow that comes from aquifer. This section of flow is important in water resource management and hydrologic researches for e.g. in precipitation-runoff modeling and water quality evaluation. Also BASE FLOW is used calibration and validation of these models. By dividing BASE FLOW on total flow, the BASE FLOW Index (BFI) is derived, that shows the amount of ground water portion in total flow. The aim of this research was to choos the best method of hydrograph separation and estimating BASE FLOW.21 years daily recharge data of Tamar station in upstream of Bustan dam in Gorganrood river catchment was separated by Local minimum, fixed interval, Sliding interval and Recursive Digital Filter (RDF) or BFLOW ALGORITHM by filter coefficients same as 0.9, 0.925, 0.95, 0.975, 0.99. Results were compared with recession curve by MAE, RMSE and Nash & Sutcliffe coefficient (E). This comparison showed that RDF by filter coefficient of 0.9 was the most suitable method for hydrograph separation in this region and 89% of total flow was BASE FLOW.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TAMASKANI, A., ZAKERINIA, M., HEZARJERIBI, A., & DEHGHANI, A.A.. (2013). COMPARISON OF BASE FLOW SEPARATION METHODS FROM DAILY FLOW HYDROGRAPH (CASE STUDY: UPSTREAM OF BOOSTAN DAM CATCHMENT IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), 20(6), 127-145. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/156137/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TAMASKANI A., ZAKERINIA M., HEZARJERIBI A., DEHGHANI A.A.. COMPARISON OF BASE FLOW SEPARATION METHODS FROM DAILY FLOW HYDROGRAPH (CASE STUDY: UPSTREAM OF BOOSTAN DAM CATCHMENT IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES)[Internet]. 2013;20(6):127-145. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/156137/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. TAMASKANI, M. ZAKERINIA, A. HEZARJERIBI, and A.A. DEHGHANI, “COMPARISON OF BASE FLOW SEPARATION METHODS FROM DAILY FLOW HYDROGRAPH (CASE STUDY: UPSTREAM OF BOOSTAN DAM CATCHMENT IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE),” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES), vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 127–145, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/156137/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button