مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,742
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE PRIORITY OF ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND SOCIAL INDICATORS OF NATIONAL PARKS USING OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES (ENTROPY, SAW AND TOPSIS)

Pages

  1-27

Abstract

 Background and objectives: NATIONAL PARKs have basic role in conservation of natural ecosystem in national and universal area. Since identification and prioritization ecological, economical and social criteria and indicators for assement of NATIONAL PARKs are very important.Materials and methods: In this study, we used Delphi questionnaire for identification very important ecological, economical and social criteria and indicators in the evaluation of NATIONAL PARKs and ENTROPY technique used for calculation wight of them. Then, MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES such as SAW and TOPSIS used for prioritization of ecological, economical and social indicators of NATIONAL PARKs.Results: The analysis of result useing of Delphi method, identificated 129 indicators and 7 criteria from aspect ecologic, economic and social for evaluation of NATIONAL PARK that after customization was determinate 89 ecologic indicators, 7 economic indicators and 15 social indicators. The result of ENTROPY technique showed that protective and environmental functions criterion whit 0.228161 weight, concervation of biological diversity whit 0.168609 weight, maintenance and development of social functions whit 0.148688 weight and productive capacity and functions whit 0.109170 weight recpectivly had the highest weight.Conclusion: The result of TOPSIS and SAW techniques showed that that protective and environmental functions criterion and concervation of biological diversity aspect of ecology had more prioritization in comparison whit other criterias. The comparison between two model results showed that result of TOPSIS technique is better than result of SAW and it more near than to reality.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOSSEINI, S., OLADI, J., & AMIRNEJAD, H.. (2016). THE PRIORITY OF ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND SOCIAL INDICATORS OF NATIONAL PARKS USING OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES (ENTROPY, SAW AND TOPSIS). JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 22(4), 1-27. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/156928/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOSSEINI S., OLADI J., AMIRNEJAD H.. THE PRIORITY OF ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND SOCIAL INDICATORS OF NATIONAL PARKS USING OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES (ENTROPY, SAW AND TOPSIS). JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2016;22(4):1-27. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/156928/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S. HOSSEINI, J. OLADI, and H. AMIRNEJAD, “THE PRIORITY OF ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMICAL AND SOCIAL INDICATORS OF NATIONAL PARKS USING OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES (ENTROPY, SAW AND TOPSIS),” JOURNAL OF WOOD AND FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–27, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/156928/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top