COMPARISON OF RSM AND LES TURBULENCE MODELS ON SHARP BEND

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOZAFFARI JAVAD; SAMADI AMIR; MOHSENI MOVAHHED SEYED ASADOLLAH; DAVOUD MAGHAMI DAVOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ferdowsi Civil Engineering Year:2016 | Volume:27 | Issue:1 Page(s): 77-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,478

Download:

392

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RSM AND LES TURBULENCE MODELS ON SHARP BEND

Author(s)

MOZAFFARI JAVAD | SAMADI AMIR | MOHSENI MOVAHHED SEYED ASADOLLAH | DAVOUD MAGHAMI DAVOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DEPTH-AVERAGED VELOCITYQ2

FLUENTQ2

SHARP BENDQ2

TURBULENCE MODELQ2

Abstract

Recognizing of river flow pattern, deposition and erosion areas in meanders is highly important. Despite the limitations of the physical models in laboratory investigation of flow pattern in meanders, mathematical models can be helpful. In this research, RSM and LES TURBULENCE MODELs have been compared on sharp river bend of a laboratory flume using FLUENT Software. The Laboratory flume is a sharp river bend established in hydraulic laboratory of EPFL. In order to investigate TURBULENCE MODELs, depth-averaged parameters were used. Moreover, to quantitatively examine those models, some longitudinal velocity profiles were selected and compared with measured ones. Results of longitudinal depth averaged velocities showed that RSM model is not able to precisely determine the important flow points. This model shows flow separation region within 85 degree and maximum width of 40 percent, though measurements indicated it was located in the region with maximum width of 60 percent of total width and approximately 75 degree. On the contrary, LES model suitably shows separation region. Besides, it better determines maximum measured depth averaged velocity situations rather than RSM model. Investigation of transversal DEPTH-AVERAGED VELOCITY distinguished LES model from RSM as the better model and finally quantitative comparison of velocity profiles showed LES model is more accurate and presents more valid authentic results.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MOZAFFARI, JAVAD, SAMADI, AMIR, MOHSENI MOVAHHED, SEYED ASADOLLAH, & DAVOUD MAGHAMI, DAVOUD. (2016). COMPARISON OF RSM AND LES TURBULENCE MODELS ON SHARP BEND. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (JOURNAL OF SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING), 27(1), 77-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/195981/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOZAFFARI JAVAD, SAMADI AMIR, MOHSENI MOVAHHED SEYED ASADOLLAH, DAVOUD MAGHAMI DAVOUD. COMPARISON OF RSM AND LES TURBULENCE MODELS ON SHARP BEND. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (JOURNAL OF SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING)[Internet]. 2016;27(1):77-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/195981/en

IEEE: Copy

JAVAD MOZAFFARI, AMIR SAMADI, SEYED ASADOLLAH MOHSENI MOVAHHED, and DAVOUD DAVOUD MAGHAMI, “COMPARISON OF RSM AND LES TURBULENCE MODELS ON SHARP BEND,” JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (JOURNAL OF SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/195981/en

Related Journal Papers