EVALUATION AND COMPARISION OF COMMON SPATIAL PATTERNS (CSP) AND INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION IN P300 DETECTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMINI Z.; ABOOTALEBI V.; SADEGHI M.T.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING) Year:2011 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 Page(s): 37-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

862

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION AND COMPARISION OF COMMON SPATIAL PATTERNS (CSP) AND INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION IN P300 DETECTION

Author(s)

AMINI Z. | ABOOTALEBI V. | SADEGHI M.T. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CSP (COMMON SPATIAL PATTERN)Q2

CLASSIFICATIONQ3

FEATURE EXTRACTIONQ3

INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATIONQ3

P300Q3

Abstract

In This Paper, two different FEATURE EXTRACTION methods were studied and their performances in pattern recognition based- P300 detection were compared. These two methods were Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) and INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION. Data set II (P300 speller) from the BCI competition 2005 was used. After pre-processing and FEATURE EXTRACTION, these features were compared. For this purpose, first, a statistical analysis had been applied for evaluating the fitness of each feature in discriminating between target and non-target signals. Then, each of these two groups of features was evaluated by a Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifier. Furthermore by using Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SWLDA), the best set of features was selected. Finally in this research, the best result for P300 detection was 95.25% for INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION as a FEATURE EXTRACTION method. This result shows that INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION is better than CSP method for P300 detection.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMINI, Z., ABOOTALEBI, V., & SADEGHI, M.T.. (2011). EVALUATION AND COMPARISION OF COMMON SPATIAL PATTERNS (CSP) AND INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION IN P300 DETECTION. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING), 2(2), 37-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/203123/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMINI Z., ABOOTALEBI V., SADEGHI M.T.. EVALUATION AND COMPARISION OF COMMON SPATIAL PATTERNS (CSP) AND INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION IN P300 DETECTION. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING)[Internet]. 2011;2(2):37-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/203123/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. AMINI, V. ABOOTALEBI, and M.T. SADEGHI, “EVALUATION AND COMPARISION OF COMMON SPATIAL PATTERNS (CSP) AND INTELLIGENT SEGMENTATION IN P300 DETECTION,” COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 37–54, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/203123/en

Related Journal Papers